Tabletop wrote:EnochLight wrote:You're completely skipping over the part that releasing a 4GB version could fracture their user-base and Expansion market, for the reasons already described. Surely this must have something to do with it, yes?
Additionally, one could surmise that the 4GB parts did in fact cost more, and when the bottom line in hardware manufacturing counts, Akai may have deemed the difference in cost too great to keep the MPC line profitable. They're a hardware manufacturer, after all.
Idk... Does a computer company fracture their user base with different models with different (4g, 8g, 16g) memory?
And yeah, they cost more, but not THAT much more when sold huge numbers. Akai would/could have charged more for the MPC units too, and made more money.
I think most of us wouldve GLADLY paid +$100 more if it had more memory. I dont have a problem maxing out memory, but it has happened before, still, it would be nice to have it there imo...
When you're paying over a G for a piece of equipment like this, adding $100 or $200 to the price is a matter of diminishing returns. Worst case, you gotta save up another few weeks or something. But then you have 2x or 3x the memory for the 5-10+ years you use the thing.
People today are putting out heat on old hardware or with just apps nowadays. So if you're gonna put out a product, might as well allow people to go ham so they get the most value out of it.
Getting a little back on topic, tho, even from the jump, with the cell phone example, people had no issues differentiating between 8 gb and 16 gb back in the day, or 64 and 128 gb today. Storage space is easy to understand, and if you're buying a sampler, so is RAM (even going back 30 years).