dustyslices wrote:[quote=“Craigs”]
The Maschine is smaller, thinner, and lighter, and they didn’t have any issue. Maybe it was a cost vs. profit issue? I couldn’t think of any other reason why they’d intentionally leave it out.
It’s got nothing to do with size — it was a conscious, logical design choice back then.
USB devices can operate in either of two modes: Host or Peripheral. Everything internally connected in the MPC runs on the USB bus, so it needs some kind of operating system to manage it. This is now handled via a USB mux, which either connects those devices to the Linux system in standalone mode or to your Windows/macOS system in controller mode.
It’s like physically plugging a USB connector into a different laptop. When in standalone mode, your laptop has no awareness of the internal drive/soundcard/MIDI/whatever. The same applies in reverse: when in controller mode, all peripherals are physically disconnected from the Linux system via a usb-mux-switch command and are instead recognized by Windows/macOS.
Try this experiment: take a ‘Y’ USB splitter, plug one end into your interface, and the other two ends into two independent laptops. Now come back and tell me the outcome

[/quote]
Yes, I understand this basic concept of the USB interfacing. I am just wondering why they made a planned, conscious decision to limit their users from having a USB output so that they could quickly and easily record into any DAW, especially Logic and monitor the MPC output thru a digital interface as well. Its pretty standard tech. I am wondering if there are any other systems that dont offer this actually. It would be not so different than making a soundboard with only XLR ins or 1/4 ins but not giving the option of both.
Anywho, I get the point. Its not an option unless I buy one of those little plastic 1980s MIDI converter contraptions that I probably have somewhere in a box with my Jr High School memorabilia.