1 bad thing about V 2.0

sparq wrote:

Lone Diplomat wrote:

sparq wrote:cowbell, after listening to your sample of the glitch effect, and doing mine again, maybe i did something wrong. how did you get the whole same to play and mine was just a tone?

that's exactly what the bug is about, it would play the entire loop with an extra flavour when it shoul only play a very very short sound...

did you watch my video? if you did, did i go through the steps the right way?

I only tried this glitch last night, but that was after you made the video. I'll view it again and see if you missed anything. But for now, I gotta run to the store and get some cold medicine.

sparq, i see you increased the end point to like 100+ when it should
be used with values like 1-20. if you want to make sure you did it correctly,
maybe this'll help:

1. load sample
2. make start point to 0, end point to 7 (thats what i use mostly)
3. switch the loop to on (on loop tab on trim screen)
4. go to program
5. put the sample on a pad
6. switch to note on
7. if needed raise the tune on the sample (the wider the value between
start and end points, the more you have to increase the tune)

see if that works for you.

i'll try it when i get home. if it works, i'll do a video on it and post it.

a lot of samplers out there do the sample glitch

i been using it since 1995

Cowbell, your nutz!! but yeah u got MAD Photoshop skills !!!

hecto wrote:sparq, i see you increased the end point to like 100+ when it should
be used with values like 1-20. if you want to make sure you did it correctly,
maybe this'll help:

1. load sample
2. make start point to 0, end point to 7 (thats what i use mostly)
3. switch the loop to on (on loop tab on trim screen)
4. go to program
5. put the sample on a pad
6. switch to note on
7. if needed raise the tune on the sample (the wider the value between
start and end points, the more you have to increase the tune)

see if that works for you.

Sparq started by setting the end point at 8. He did everything right....
It's not necessary to place the sample in PROGRAM to test it, it should be audible in TRIM mode. Selecting a sample in PROGRAM doesn't change the core sample.

I'm afraid Sparq's right, Akai has (unconsciously?) overwritten the sample/loop engine.

It's too bad cause it was a great 'bug' that wasn't irritating for anybody who wasn't bothered with the glitch (hardly anybody uses a 0.01 second loop anyway) and it was great for those who wanted to experiment with it.

Penfold wrote:Cowbell, your nutz!! but yeah u got MAD Photoshop skills !!!

Well thank you Penfold
I went back to the graveyard this morning to take another pic by daylight.
It's hard losing a 'bug' you love so much...sniff

cowbell wrote:

hecto wrote:sparq, i see you increased the end point to like 100+ when it should
be used with values like 1-20. if you want to make sure you did it correctly,
maybe this'll help:

1. load sample
2. make start point to 0, end point to 7 (thats what i use mostly)
3. switch the loop to on (on loop tab on trim screen)
4. go to program
5. put the sample on a pad
6. switch to note on
7. if needed raise the tune on the sample (the wider the value between
start and end points, the more you have to increase the tune)

see if that works for you.

Sparq started by setting the end point at 8. He did everything right....
It's not necessary to place the sample in PROGRAM to test it, it should be audible in TRIM mode. Selecting a sample in PROGRAM doesn't change the core sample.

I'm afraid Sparq's right, Akai has (unconsciously?) overwritten the sample/loop engine.

It's too bad cause it was a great 'bug' that wasn't irritating for anybody who wasn't bothered with the glitch (hardly anybody uses a 0.01 second loop anyway) and it was great for those who wanted to experiment with it.

yeah like i said before i'm sure it doesent work on the new OS, but
it would've been cool to see it not working on the program mode
(just to make sure). im almost certain it won't help anything..
i guess akai was thinking something like, "we can't have a bug in our
new OS, how does that look like?" or they just accidentaly overwrote
it with the 2.0. anyways, it sure is a shame

i cant be the only person here with a second sampler

IT WORKS IN OTHER SAMPLERS PEOPLE, IVE BEEN DOING IT FOR YEARS

get an EPS for $100 and there you go
what's the big **** deal bitches?!

tiger vomitt wrote:i cant be the only person here with a second sampler

IT WORKS IN OTHER SAMPLERS PEOPLE, IVE BEEN DOING IT FOR YEARS

get an EPS for $100 and there you go
what's the big **** deal bitches?!

I like to have it in an MPC. But thanks for the EPS tip, biatch

EPS was where i figured it out. confused the hell out of me the first time i noticed it! i thought i was going back in time or something - "wait a minute! i sampled that 2 WEEKS AGO!!! WTF?!?!?!?!?!" haha

i think my s3000xl does it too, in which case an s2000 would likely do it as well

tiger vomitt wrote:what's the big **** deal bitches?!

hey, i'm not having none of that in this thread. i mentioned b4 this is not the thread for that.

tiger vomitt wrote:i think my s3000xl does it too, in which case an s2000 would likely do it as well

Serious? I got a S3000, i will check it on that.

sorry about that

i'll stop

tiger vomitt wrote:i cant be the only person here with a second sampler

IT WORKS IN OTHER SAMPLERS PEOPLE, IVE BEEN DOING IT FOR YEARS

get an EPS for $100 and there you go
what's the big **** deal bitches?!

sure thing. you can go out and hook up an eps, or, you can have it in your
mpc. whatever you like. hope youre ok man!