Post your questions, opinions and reviews of the MPC1000. This forum is for discussion of the OFFICIAL Akai OS (2.1). If you wish to discuss the JJ OS, please use the dedicated JJ OS forum

By tiger vomitt Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:37 pm
Mr modnaR wrote:i guess you could try monitoring thru the spdif, and then tracking thru it too, see if that makes a difference.


that's not a bad idea..i hadnt considered it! but it would not work, for several reasons, and here's why

-id get latency monitoring spdif thru my soundcard (a MOTU box). as in, hit a pad and i dont know 300ms later i hear a fart sample or whatever it is im playing with

-i like the thick quality of the analog ouputs and id miss it if it were not there (i forget what thread i just wrote this in, but i went from an xl back to a 1k for that reason)

-a big reason i use an mpc is so that i am not using a computer to write. i love computers and am really comfortable with them but i dont like writing music on them. so spdif monitoring, at least in my setup, would involve a computer.

but thanks for the idea, good to keep an open mind!
User avatar

By Mr modnaR Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:39 pm
tiger vomitt wrote:
Mr modnaR wrote:i guess you could try monitoring thru the spdif, and then tracking thru it too, see if that makes a difference.


that's not a bad idea..i hadnt considered it! but it would not work, for several reasons, and here's why

-id get latency monitoring spdif thru my soundcard (a MOTU box). as in, hit a pad and i dont know 300ms later i hear a fart sample or whatever it is im playing with

-i like the thick quality of the analog ouputs and id miss it if it were not there (i forget what thread i just wrote this in, but i went from an xl back to a 1k for that reason)

-a big reason i use an mpc is so that i am not using a computer to write. i love computers and am really comfortable with them but i dont like writing music on them. so spdif monitoring, at least in my setup, would involve a computer.

but thanks for the idea, good to keep an open mind!


you could also get an digital to analog converter box, i think behringer do a nice cheap one. you shouldn't get latency with that!! hope this helps

By tiger vomitt Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:41 pm
but then i'll have icky beringer color, which is way worse!
User avatar

By Mr modnaR Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:01 am
tiger vomitt wrote:but then i'll have icky beringer color, which is way worse!


aaahh, true, well spend thousands, then you should be set. lol
User avatar
By DJ-T Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:09 am
EMFinite wrote:i have both and IMO they sound almost the same.

the 1k sounds more clean than the xl.


first you have to listen and look at the DSP chip in the machines. The 3000
has the thicker sound than any of the machines including the 4000. I had the 2000xl and the 1k , but their both close in similar ways (sounds) work around? 1k surpasses the 2000xl by far, transfering sounds from 1k to PC
rather than transfering from zip, scsi,ex-hd slooooooooooow man! 8) :shock: :roll:
User avatar

By TBonus76 Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:22 am
tiger vomitt wrote:thanks for the suggestion ant

it has to do with the analog outs are colored a certain way. so what happens is, when i record the 1k thru the digital out, all of a sudden im not hearing the beat i did anymore. cuz then it's colored a totally different way.


The difference you are hearing is probably not a difference in the outputs of the MPC, but rather a difference between the internal D/A converter in the MPC (when using the analog outs), and whatever other D/A converter you are using (when using the SPDIF out).

By tiger vomitt Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:25 am
yes, absolutely. i am aware of that.

all these boxes are colored differently, even though they try not to be! like a lavry D/A box is gonna sound different than the digidesign stuff, etc