All modern synths and samplers have special hardware, yes. But what runs the hardware? Software. Todays computers are powerful enough to emulate/simulate the shit out of most synths and samplers. For me, hardware music equipment is for stability, portability, getting away from the screen and of course, creativity.
I'm definitely not saying one sounds better than the other, just the other way around. Say that you digitally rip a piece of music from a CD on a PC, then transfer it to the MPC and play it there. If it sounds "fatter/better/groovier" there than on your regular CD, without any effects/filters etc being applied to it, then something is not right, in my opinion.
A couple of words on hybridbeats points...
1) If AD->DA conversion makes the music muffled times two, how can then music "created within the computer" sound even worse, when you are in fact missing one conversion? This sounds like a personal opinion to me, maybe he's not to fond of clean sounds?
2) Quantize on Recording and Swing are available on most computer sequencers. And once again, like with the sample above, a midi file should not change characteristics between different systems if no effects are applied to it. The MPC's swing function is hardly unique.
3) This is a viable point. The AD converters can have characteristics on for example overload that other samplers/soundcards don't. But then again, we don't know this. Also, this is a hardware thing, not software/computer specifically.
Once again. I have an MPC. I love it. I also love my other little boxes and my computer with it's next to irritatingly endless possibilites. I just think it's a bit naive to think that once's beats would suddenly get fat from buying an MPC.
Believe me, I know the feeling. I'm a gearaholic with a severe case of the newgearitis. But it's not in the gear, it's in your head!
And oh yeah by the way, I didn't grow up on no hip hop music. Sorry.
