
By primebeatz
Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:39 pm
Why is Ableton Live the best software to use with MPC 1k? I heard the guy at Guitar Center tell a customer that.




Why is Ableton Live the best software to use with MPC 1k?
motormind wrote:The bad: somehow Ableton maganed to screw up midi sync, which makes synching the MPC and Live very tedious.
motormind wrote:Ableton is both good and bad with the MPC. The good is: preparing stuff for the MPC and the capability to easily edit loops you recorded into Live. The bad: somehow Ableton maganed to screw up midi sync, which makes synching the MPC and Live very tedious.
sleepersriddle wrote:motormind wrote:Ableton is both good and bad with the MPC. The good is: preparing stuff for the MPC and the capability to easily edit loops you recorded into Live. The bad: somehow Ableton maganed to screw up midi sync, which makes synching the MPC and Live very tedious.
So what sync problems are you having?
My only complaint so far is that Ableton only seems to sync to the nearest BPM, drifting until the track is 1/32nd note off, then re-syncing and adding a warp marker. (dunno if the latest version is any worse or better.)
just as you say, i use mpc as master.
im sure live5 could also be master; but it doesn't make sense for me to do that, because the mpc controls all my gear, and it will send tighter midi when running by its own clock.
midi sync coming out of a typical pc interface tends to be ****, and would make the mpc timing worse, affecting all my tracks.
when using mpc as master, timing is tight between/within each incoming audio track... and the sloppy computer timing only comes into play when chopping up / moving stuff around in live. but i can nudge the beat markers there, if i have to.
sleepersriddle wrote:This is a good thread...
Question: why do you say you can't record multiple clips at once? You do know there is an option somewhere allowing multiple tracks to be armed for record, right? Then you push the 'scene' button to start all the clips recording at once. Maybe you only have a 2-channel input sound card?
Anyway, then the problem arises, if a second recording pass is made, the new clips might not be positioned correctly compared to the older clips.
The first tip here would be:: make sure to give a couple of bars 'pre-rolling' by starting the mpc playing first, then later starting to record.
Second tip: adjust your sync latency until you see that clips are recording hits on beat 'one' right on the one. (zoom in to check.) That might not _technically_ improve the issue, but it lets you hear things properly while doing the recording, which saves hassles. And it will save time with chopping later.
Third tip: use recordings of similar lengths, and keep the pre-roll time consistant. That minimizes the problem of clock drift over time.
Fourth tip: don't drag the actual green warp markers to make fixes... rather drag the start marker. That way the clip doesn't have to be tempo stretched by even a little.
Between all these tips, I would estimate that my newer clips might be offset compared to old ones by a random error of 1ms to 3ms. (Just a rough estimate.) I should measure that.
I'm not totally happy with the situation yet. Here's what they should make IMHO:: a box that would take a high-res clicktrack coming out of a digital output (from pc) and turn that into super-stable midi clock. That would solve everyone's problems, cause audio timing jitter from a pc interface seems less than midi timing jitter. Anyone got something like that, let me know. If I find more time, I could build one myself using some kind of PIC chip, I bet.Great idea! that kindah Midi Box would be verry nice
EDIT:: hah that was post number 909. Fitting.