Share your knowledge on these two classic MPCs
User avatar
By bomb beats Sun Jan 18, 2009 1:27 am
Don't tel me. You bought the entry level MPC! And you call me stupid.
By SNMTK Sun Jan 18, 2009 5:55 am
Sinamatik wrote:your too stupid to respond to, so I dont think i need to say anything else
By jrides Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:43 am
EM-PEE-SEE Comparison Forum

Home of all goofy @ss Nukai vs Linn workflow threads. Feel free to move your debate over there.

I dont use either anymore... I have upgraded to Human Beat Box for the 481029874823712017 bit "in your face" quality. (Its almost like you can feel the moisture from my beeeets)

Thats grimey.
User avatar
By mr_debauch Mon Jan 19, 2009 6:25 am
jrides wrote:EM-PEE-SEE Comparison Forum

Home of all goofy @ss Nukai vs Linn workflow threads. Feel free to move your debate over there.

I dont use either anymore... I have upgraded to Human Beat Box for the 481029874823712017 bit "in your face" quality. (Its almost like you can feel the moisture from my beeeets)

Thats grimey.



Yeah, at that level it gets to the point of comparing a beat boxer with gold or platinum teeth ! :lol:
User avatar
By 64hz Mon Jan 19, 2009 6:19 pm
I have them both and both of them have their pro and cons. Get over the fact that it is entry level since that doesnt mean shit... it still has more functions then a 60.
User avatar
By mr_debauch Mon Jan 19, 2009 7:48 pm
64hz wrote:I have them both and both of them have their pro and cons. Get over the fact that it is entry level since that doesnt mean ****... it still has more functions then a 60.



well you have to look at the context of entry level... in the 60 era it was state of the art.. now the 500 with 10 times more functions is entry level... but i have a feeling that name is given according to it's new just released listed price within the MPC family.. wasn't the 60 like 5k when it dropped?
User avatar
By kneebone77 Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:39 pm
That term entry level is totally talking about cost, and possibly the trimming down of Physical I/O specs. But feature wise the 500 is all MPC.
User avatar
By mr_debauch Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:08 pm
kneebone77 wrote:That term entry level is totally talking about cost, and possibly the trimming down of Physical I/O specs. But feature wise the 500 is all MPC.



yeah I was thinking i/o specs also.. the average home user might not require standard 8 outs... i mean hobbiests not home studio producers of course.

Personally though, I dont see myself dropping a few hundred on a mpc500... the 12 pads just seems like a turn off, and I wouldn't take out an mpc on the subway.
User avatar
By 64hz Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:02 pm
I wanted somethign i cou+d take along with me. It surprised me :)
User avatar
By kneebone77 Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:03 pm
mr_debauch wrote:yeah I was thinking i/o specs also.. the average home user might not require standard 8 outs... i mean hobbiests not home studio producers of course.

Personally though, I dont see myself dropping a few hundred on a mpc500... the 12 pads just seems like a turn off, and I wouldn't take out an mpc on the subway.


Yeah, the 3X4 pads instead of 4X4 is the biggest turn off to me. As far as I/O's go I don't mind the fact that it's only got stereo main outs. 95% of the time that's all I'm using anyway. I think it would've be dope if they added one more midi out though...
User avatar
By mr_debauch Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:32 am
firework wrote:will? its been obsolete.



well all MPC's can be seen that way if you take into account computers with DAWs... anyways isn't it possible to install a CF reader on the 60?
User avatar
By oLee.eeZus Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:16 am
mr_debauch wrote:
anyways isn't it possible to install a CF reader on the 60?


Yesir!
User avatar
By Ben.H Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:13 pm
firework wrote:will? its been obsolete.


exactly. it IS obsolete, just that people still and will use it because its the right kind of obsolete - like a vintage instrument, not like a vintage computer
By Toe Tue Jan 20, 2009 1:32 pm
oLee.eeZus wrote:
mr_debauch wrote:
anyways isn't it possible to install a CF reader on the 60?


Yesir!


Yes indeed, just did my one yesterday

Image

I have a 60 and a 500, they sound very different. I was working on the 60 yesterday, I had one 16 second sample in it and I wanted to chop out parts of it and assign to a pad like I do on the 500, but couldn't, that was a pain in the a*s. But the 60 is a great machine, I'm sure I will be rocking it alot in the years to come.