i had a 2K
i've used a 1K, 2kXL, 3K, and 60
60 is illest for drums
3K is real ill sounding too
1K is a piece
2K is aight if you engineer the drums, but as far as coming out of it, it sucks too

By redgreenz
Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:47 pm
Went from a 1k to a 2kxl, to a 60/3000.... dumped 'em all and kept the 3k... the 60 is the absolute s**t, but I prefer havin more sample time.. 3k all day, IMHO
peace,
peace,
=redgreenz=
____________________
SKURRRTTT ON SUCKAS
____________________
SKURRRTTT ON SUCKAS
By actionated
Fri Apr 28, 2006 3:52 am
they all good for what they are. it all depends on what your making and the feel your going for.
By Nalij
Fri Apr 28, 2006 8:39 pm
I currently own an MPC 2000 classic...and it makes drums sound like crap
By earwolf
Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:23 pm
Nalij wrote:I currently own an MPC 2000 classic...and it makes drums sound like ****
is that a good or bad thing
By Nalij
Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:43 am
its bad
By Nalij
Sat Apr 29, 2006 6:17 pm
dstruction wrote:i have a classic 2k also, and my drums are knockin.
I mean compared to the 60, 3000 and sp

By Antonym
Sun Apr 30, 2006 2:19 am
while the mpc may give a certain sound to whatever you're trying to do, more of a unique sound is derived during mixing/mastering/fx in the daw. much more.

By Eponim
Tue May 02, 2006 9:28 am
What's the better, a machine which doesn't modify the sound or not?
Here is the veritable question, I prefer to choose which sound my machine put out. I prefer the first one, so I prefer the 2xl.
Here is the veritable question, I prefer to choose which sound my machine put out. I prefer the first one, so I prefer the 2xl.
By earwolf
Tue May 02, 2006 11:02 am
Antonym wrote:while the mpc may give a certain sound to whatever you're trying to do, more of a unique sound is derived during mixing/mastering/fx in the daw. much more.
nah...

By Hypes
Tue May 02, 2006 8:24 pm
earwolf wrote:Antonym wrote:while the mpc may give a certain sound to whatever you're trying to do, more of a unique sound is derived during mixing/mastering/fx in the daw. much more.
nah...
wtf do you mean Nah?
thats the truest thing said on this post yet.
you guys are all just going back and forth saying what YOU think sounds better. it would be a matter of opinion. when you take the tracks into a DAW you will be able to get your FAT or Grimey sound through mastering/fx. since thats what you all are worried about.
It will depend on the person.
-Hypes
By earwolf
Tue May 02, 2006 11:07 pm
Hypes wrote:earwolf wrote:Antonym wrote:while the mpc may give a certain sound to whatever you're trying to do, more of a unique sound is derived during mixing/mastering/fx in the daw. much more.
nah...
wtf do you mean Nah?
thats the truest thing said on this post yet.
you guys are all just going back and forth saying what YOU think sounds better. it would be a matter of opinion. when you take the tracks into a DAW you will be able to get your FAT or Grimey sound through mastering/fx. since thats what you all are worried about.
It will depend on the person.
nah...

By Antonym
Wed May 03, 2006 2:21 am
justify yourself, ear...are you meaning to say that the trademark 3000 sound does more to improve one's sound than a professional your engineer?


