Can't decide which MPC to choose? Read these resources or post your questions here.

ByRed_Dragon Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:57 am
The 2500 does have master effects. I love'em! I used to work with the 4000 also, and didn't like the sound of the 2500. Although, after i read the manual and played with this thing. I can add warmth and punch to the 2500's sound. The master effect feature is a lifesaver! :D
User avatar

By redgreenz Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:47 pm
Went from a 1k to a 2kxl, to a 60/3000.... dumped 'em all and kept the 3k... the 60 is the absolute s**t, but I prefer havin more sample time.. 3k all day, IMHO

peace,

By actionated Fri Apr 28, 2006 3:52 am
they all good for what they are. it all depends on what your making and the feel your going for.

By earwolf Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:23 pm
Nalij wrote:I currently own an MPC 2000 classic...and it makes drums sound like ****


is that a good or bad thing
User avatar

By DSTRUCT Sat Apr 29, 2006 4:22 pm
i have a classic 2k also, and my drums are knockin.
User avatar

By Antonym Sun Apr 30, 2006 2:19 am
while the mpc may give a certain sound to whatever you're trying to do, more of a unique sound is derived during mixing/mastering/fx in the daw. much more.
User avatar

By Eponim Tue May 02, 2006 9:28 am
What's the better, a machine which doesn't modify the sound or not?
Here is the veritable question, I prefer to choose which sound my machine put out. I prefer the first one, so I prefer the 2xl. 8)

By earwolf Tue May 02, 2006 11:02 am
Antonym wrote:while the mpc may give a certain sound to whatever you're trying to do, more of a unique sound is derived during mixing/mastering/fx in the daw. much more.


nah...
User avatar

By Hypes Tue May 02, 2006 8:24 pm
earwolf wrote:
Antonym wrote:while the mpc may give a certain sound to whatever you're trying to do, more of a unique sound is derived during mixing/mastering/fx in the daw. much more.


nah...


wtf do you mean Nah?


thats the truest thing said on this post yet.

you guys are all just going back and forth saying what YOU think sounds better. it would be a matter of opinion. when you take the tracks into a DAW you will be able to get your FAT or Grimey sound through mastering/fx. since thats what you all are worried about.

It will depend on the person.

By earwolf Tue May 02, 2006 11:07 pm
Hypes wrote:
earwolf wrote:
Antonym wrote:while the mpc may give a certain sound to whatever you're trying to do, more of a unique sound is derived during mixing/mastering/fx in the daw. much more.


nah...


wtf do you mean Nah?


thats the truest thing said on this post yet.

you guys are all just going back and forth saying what YOU think sounds better. it would be a matter of opinion. when you take the tracks into a DAW you will be able to get your FAT or Grimey sound through mastering/fx. since thats what you all are worried about.

It will depend on the person.


nah...
User avatar

By Antonym Wed May 03, 2006 2:21 am
justify yourself, ear...are you meaning to say that the trademark 3000 sound does more to improve one's sound than a professional your engineer?