Bug reports & end-user support for Akai's MPC Software 'controllers' including the new MPC Studio 2, the MPC Touch, MPC Renaissance & original MPC Studio and MPC StudioB lack.
By acura Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:25 pm
konc3pt wrote:this is funny yall wish to be able to name things from teh hardware, while I wish I was able to do it on mpc2500 from computer keybaord like on mpc 4000 :mrgreen: :lol:

what's exactly teh benefit of doing long way and typing up name letter for letter from hardware as opposed to using computer keyboard and doing the same task in 2 seconds :lol:

that's some masochist **** :mrgreen: :lol:


No no, don't get me wrong! I say, if i name it with my keyboard, i want the field and the pre-given name to be highlighted, so i don't have to click in there first to delete that name (cause most of the time i want a different).

So for example, if i want to extract a sample, the pre-given name is already highlighted. Now all i have to do is type a new name on my keyboard and press do it! :wink:
By wakko1999 Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:46 pm
konc3pt wrote:this is funny yall wish to be able to name things from teh hardware, while I wish I was able to do it on mpc2500 from computer keybaord like on mpc 4000 :mrgreen: :lol:

what's exactly teh benefit of doing long way and typing up name letter for letter from hardware as opposed to using computer keyboard and doing the same task in 2 seconds :lol:

that's some masochist shit :mrgreen: :lol:



Yea I know, I have to agree..but it's something I wish I could do even though I know going to the mouse, looking at the monitor, clicking in the field and then typing would definitely be faster than how trying to type a name on the hard are could ever be done. For me, just that little action of having to look away from the hardware feels clunky and breaks my flow badly (but not always...). It's one Reason I never smoothly use Reason until recently (I got a P4 the same time I got the Ren and it lets me stay on the hardware almost entirely, but it too doesn't have direct track renaming, but its the only reason I have to look away from the hardware. It's seems the more direct hardware functionality I get the more I want to do everything from it I guess). It's less about the keyboard and more having to reach for the mouse and look up constantly at the monitor.

Now that I think about it, I wish they would make the Sequence, Track and Instrument section in the software mimic the classic layout found on the hardware screen (lay it out horizontally and put the project info section underneath it--or give users the option of "new" or "classic" layout or something). For me, looking up to the monitor and having to reorient my eyes to a layout that differs and trying to zero in on the field I want to modify breaks up the flow. If it were laid out in a consistent manner I may have less of a problem zeroing in because my eyes are already familiar with where to expect find everything from working on the hardware for however many straight minutes/hours, etc....

Anyway, I agree they could probably never create a faster way to type on the hardware, but I think they could at least implement a away to initiate a rename from the hardware (it highlights the field in the software as was previously mentioned by a prior post and presents a rename window on the hardware) and then allows you to start typing with your keyboard, press enter and the name on the hardware screen refreshes with the new name. This way I could stay focused on the MPC screen and never really have to look at the monitor or make a lateral reach for the mouse.
User avatar
By DSTR / deStar Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:58 pm
Totally agree with you Wakko.

And for those like me that are used to the hardware workflow, typing with the pads is second nature. Much faster than breaking your concentration from the hardware to go to the software to name a #&?%P#%? track or program or sequence.
User avatar
By JAH Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:07 am
IMO, since we can't name from the hardware is makes sense that the cursor is in the 'Type' field as 'New Name' is not a selectable param on the LCD. This keeps the LCD and software uniform.

If or when naming from the hardware is implemented, then the cursor should default to 'New Name' field IMO.
By PhoenixMan21 Sat Dec 29, 2012 4:28 pm
wakko1999 wrote:
konc3pt wrote:this is funny yall wish to be able to name things from teh hardware, while I wish I was able to do it on mpc2500 from computer keybaord like on mpc 4000 :mrgreen: :lol:

what's exactly teh benefit of doing long way and typing up name letter for letter from hardware as opposed to using computer keyboard and doing the same task in 2 seconds :lol:

that's some masochist **** :mrgreen: :lol:



Now that I think about it, I wish they would make the Sequence, Track and Instrument section in the software mimic the classic layout found on the hardware screen (lay it out horizontally and put the project info section underneath it--or give users the option of "new" or "classic" layout or something). For me, looking up to the monitor and having to reorient my eyes to a layout that differs and trying to zero in on the field I want to modify breaks up the flow. If it were laid out in a consistent manner I may have less of a problem zeroing in because my eyes are already familiar with where to expect find everything from working on the hardware for however many straight minutes/hours, etc....



+1,000,000 :nod:

Now thats some damn fine logic if ever i heard it yall...forget dem pretty hi res colours...or in the case of the mpc software gui, them grey dull tones and rectangles...consistency is the key...consistency and end product over style and flashyness... :mrgreen:
User avatar
By JAH Sat Dec 29, 2012 4:31 pm
I see a lot of old threads being bumped by new members or members who rarely post in this forum. A little suspect.....
User avatar
By DSTR / deStar Wed May 08, 2013 6:13 pm
SukhDee wrote:I just picked mine up and so far I'm blown away with all the things you can't do in the hardware


Insane. It's like what's the point.