Support and discussion for all of Akai’s modern standalone MPCs including the MPC X / X SE, MPC Live 1, 2 & 3, MPC One / One+, MPC Key 37/61.
User avatar
By Lampdog Thu Aug 08, 2024 9:19 pm
RonDu wrote:Maaaaan. So far I'm not feeling this MPC One. Almost every thing that I do I have to watch a friggin video for it. This is madness. SMH. I end up shutting the $h*t off out of frustration and doing something else. lol

I came from 2kxl and then 4k, got a X after borrowing a friend's Live for 1 week. The very first day with X I was making beats and LOT's of things in my head clicked right away. It's not hard. flowers a video.
Rely on you. Read that manual.
By J.O.BEATS Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:10 pm
I don’t see how you went from the 2000 to the XL and can’t figure out the One. Its the same workflow with more options and extras.
User avatar
By Ultros Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:18 pm
MPC One is still pro audio gear broski @ original poster. Knobs and dials are worthless and when it comes sound interfaces they are a dime a dozen for good stuff now. The live and live ii offer a battery and the live ii has speakers. (not the most practical thing for production). you made the exact right choice imho cus you got an mpc that does all the mpc stuff the same as the rest and you saved mad loot not paying for dials and abs plastic.

one thing i wish the one had was sata..
User avatar
By Lampdog Sat Aug 17, 2024 3:01 am
J.O.BEATS wrote:It’s the same workflow with more options and extras.

I felt this same way from 2kxl to MPC X. It took me a day or 2 to get comfortable and off I went. Exact same methods but w/ extras.
User avatar
By hyena Sun Aug 18, 2024 10:38 am
dryad-66 wrote:
kidkeitel wrote:Wont sound as good as your 2500.

I agree and disagree.The 2500 can sound very good and can sound flat as well.The One is a kind of medium,neutral sound.More like a computter daw.depends what you want.Personally I like to hear samples playing back through the 2500 more as there is some warmth/character (yeah I know,controversial opinion) there that engages my ear.But for a lot of the rest The One is more practical for modern music.So many features and connectivity and portability.Best thing to do is use them side by side and then decide…..


perfectly put imho.
By B-Wise Sun Aug 18, 2024 11:17 am
dryad-66 wrote:
kidkeitel wrote:Wont sound as good as your 2500.

I agree and disagree.The 2500 can sound very good and can sound flat as well.The One is a kind of medium,neutral sound.More like a computter daw.depends what you want.Personally I like to hear samples playing back through the 2500 more as there is some warmth/character (yeah I know,controversial opinion) there that engages my ear.But for a lot of the rest The One is more practical for modern music.So many features and connectivity and portability.Best thing to do is use them side by side and then decide…..


hyena wrote:perfectly put imho.

Perfectly BS. The 2500 ain't got more character/warmth compared to a One. You dudes are buggin'.

I got a 1k (& messed up 2500) & the Force. Please tell me where do I find this extra character/warmth on the 1k that the One/Force lacks?
By sinik Sun Aug 18, 2024 11:37 am
i think as far as sound goes, its not worth debating over those 2 machines. neither of them has a special kind of sound. if you are looking for sound, a toraiz sp-16 (discontinued) or the isla s2400 are the modern day options. otherwise, the legacy mpc's, sp's or asr and so on.

one thing i dont like about the modern mpc's is the touchscreen and the not well thought out UX design. yes, the new mpc's come with so much more options, but i always found the touchscreen workflow to be less intuitive in some areas and less fun to make beats with it. but that may be a very personal opinion, and there are sure a lot of people who are enjoy using a touchscreen.
By B-Wise Sun Aug 18, 2024 12:48 pm
sinik wrote:i think as far as sound goes, its not worth debating over those 2 machines. neither of them has a special kind of sound. if you are looking for sound, a toraiz sp-16 (discontinued) or the isla s2400 are the modern day options. otherwise, the legacy mpc's, sp's or asr and so on.

one thing i dont like about the modern mpc's is the touchscreen and the not well thought out UX design. yes, the new mpc's come with so much more options, but i always found the touchscreen workflow to be less intuitive in some areas and less fun to make beats with it. but that may be a very personal opinion, and there are sure a lot of people who are enjoy using a touchscreen.

It's just funny hearing people on this site of all places that still have the 1k/2500 thread up with all those debates about how they suck or sounds too clean & now hear this talk about them sound warm or whatever.

About the touchscreen, I thought I would hate it, but now I just look at it like another way to navigate the box. It's like big colorful button with other little buttons. I think most of the dislike for it is because it's a form modern tech found on things like tablets/smartphones & some people dislike for those thing get transferred to the MPC touchscreen. It may be just a case of changing your perspective like did with seeing it as a big colorful button & realizing that, using the screen or a button to do the something is the same damn thing in the end most of the time. I still wouldn't want to play notes on the screen.
User avatar
By Lampdog Sun Aug 18, 2024 3:10 pm
B-Wise wrote:About the touchscreen, I thought I would hate it, but now I just look at it like another way to navigate the box. It's like big colorful button with other little buttons. I think most of the dislike for it is because it's a form modern tech found on things like tablets/smartphones & some people dislike for those thing get transferred to the MPC touchscreen.

Just wait ‘till people stop hiding the fact that when reading a magazine they actually “touch” the page to scroll. They haven’t told you that part yet.

B-Wise wrote:. I still wouldn't want to play notes on the screen.

Ipad, BM3 w/ moog model d, it aint bad at all.

Image
By B-Wise Sun Aug 18, 2024 3:28 pm
Lampdog wrote:
B-Wise wrote:About the touchscreen, I thought I would hate it, but now I just look at it like another way to navigate the box. It's like big colorful button with other little buttons. I think most of the dislike for it is because it's a form modern tech found on things like tablets/smartphones & some people dislike for those thing get transferred to the MPC touchscreen.

Just wait ‘till people stop hiding the fact that when reading a magazine they actually “touch” the page to scroll. They haven’t told you that part yet.

B-Wise wrote:. I still wouldn't want to play notes on the screen.

Ipad, BM3 w/ moog model d, it aint bad at all.

Image

:lol:

Playing on a screen is something I could do, but I just wouldn't want to do it, especially when I got 88 weighted keyboard. If I'm tapping drums with Full Level on than... maybe, but I still would rather have some pads to bang on.
User avatar
By HanHuman Sun Aug 18, 2024 5:44 pm
bitermc wrote:And, yes, don’t sell the 2500 yet :mrgreen:

Don't sell the 2500 ever :smoker:
Especially with JJOS, as it's gonna be the most powerful "Old MPC workflow" available after MPC 3 comes out. Having both for different things makes a lot of sense imo.
User avatar
By Lampdog Sun Aug 18, 2024 9:12 pm
HanHuman wrote:Don't sell the 4K ever :smoker:



Is what people keep telling me.
By dryad-66 Sun Aug 18, 2024 9:15 pm
B-Wise wrote:
sinik wrote:i think as far as sound goes, its not worth debating over those 2 machines. neither of them has a special kind of sound. if you are looking for sound, a toraiz sp-16 (discontinued) or the isla s2400 are the modern day options. otherwise, the legacy mpc's, sp's or asr and so on.

one thing i dont like about the modern mpc's is the touchscreen and the not well thought out UX design. yes, the new mpc's come with so much more options, but i always found the touchscreen workflow to be less intuitive in some areas and less fun to make beats with it. but that may be a very personal opinion, and there are sure a lot of people who are enjoy using a touchscreen.

It's just funny hearing people on this site of all places that still have the 1k/2500 thread up with all those debates about how they suck or sounds too clean & now hear this talk about them sound warm or whatever.

About the touchscreen, I thought I would hate it, but now I just look at it like another way to navigate the box. It's like big colorful button with other little buttons. I think most of the dislike for it is because it's a form modern tech found on things like tablets/smartphones & some people dislike for those thing get transferred to the MPC touchscreen. It may be just a case of changing your perspective like did with seeing it as a big colorful button & realizing that, using the screen or a button to do the something is the same damn thing in the end most of the time. I still wouldn't want to play notes on the screen.

Your a straight up clown ,in every forum you post.You cant just let someone have there own freakin’ opinion on a public thread.Ive been using these MPCs starting on the OG2000 since the late 90s.Probs had over 30 Indevidual units.Damn been on this sight for 15 years about.Contributing.Yeah i like to hear ‘my’ samples through those numark units.Got a problem with that?lol


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUOL-xFhy-U
By B-Wise Mon Aug 19, 2024 8:19 am
dryad-66 wrote:
sinik wrote:i think as far as sound goes, its not worth debating over those 2 machines. neither of them has a special kind of sound. if you are looking for sound, a toraiz sp-16 (discontinued) or the isla s2400 are the modern day options. otherwise, the legacy mpc's, sp's or asr and so on.

one thing i dont like about the modern mpc's is the touchscreen and the not well thought out UX design. yes, the new mpc's come with so much more options, but i always found the touchscreen workflow to be less intuitive in some areas and less fun to make beats with it. but that may be a very personal opinion, and there are sure a lot of people who are enjoy using a touchscreen.


B-Wise wrote:It's just funny hearing people on this site of all places that still have the 1k/2500 thread up with all those debates about how they suck or sounds too clean & now hear this talk about them sound warm or whatever.

About the touchscreen, I thought I would hate it, but now I just look at it like another way to navigate the box. It's like big colorful button with other little buttons. I think most of the dislike for it is because it's a form modern tech found on things like tablets/smartphones & some people dislike for those thing get transferred to the MPC touchscreen. It may be just a case of changing your perspective like did with seeing it as a big colorful button & realizing that, using the screen or a button to do the something is the same damn thing in the end most of the time. I still wouldn't want to play notes on the screen.


Your a straight up clown ,in every forum you post.You cant just let someone have there own freakin’ opinion on a public thread.Ive been using these MPCs starting on the OG2000 since the late 90s.Probs had over 30 Indevidual units.Damn been on this sight for 15 years about.Contributing.Yeah i like to hear ‘my’ samples through those numark units.Got a problem with that?lol


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUOL-xFhy-U

Why did you quote this? Me & sinik are kinda in agreement about the MPC sound. I don't have a problem with Numark units sounding bad, I just don't think they sound better than the current stuff. I don't care what MPC you play your beats on as long as it's dope. Thanks for Large Pro video with only the only MPC I still got that still works.