By Cockdiesel
Wed Dec 18, 2019 12:02 am
Bezo wrote:Cockdiesel wrote:Would y’all give them credit if there was legit reason they had to add this like contractually obligated or this is needed for further advancement?Any reason is legit, less sabotaging the units.
Contractually obligated? I'd still be indifferent to a deal made with a company whose product I don't use. If this were for the Force only, I'd get it as that appears to be made for Ableton.
Future advancement? That could be anything. This is future advancement and does nothing for me, and I suspect nothing for the majority of users.
There’s much we will never know, especially with how the development of the original push came about between the two companies.
Ever think this is why akai got the first crack at standalone push, the force? Only speculation but it shouldn’t be thrown away either.
By future advancement I meant like the foundation for something we have no clue about.
How about this. Akai realized you were the most loyal and best customer and decided to make studio 1 control instead? That’s the daw you use no? Would you still have the same stance?
Don’t you think you could come across selfish if the update isn’t tailored to exactly your needs?
There are legit reasons to criticize, but an update not tailored to you is not one of them.
In the last year akai has paired with fl studio and ableton. That’s a huge market share, if given time I would assume you see partnerships with others...


