
By peterpiper
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:01 pm
During listening I realised the volume difference, thats why I cut the loops and peak normalized them individualy to get the 'same' volume.
I havn't heard much difference (well, in the end the things I've heard were caused by expectation : It HAS to sound different) but I couldn't tell which one was which sampler so I tried to be uber smart and analyzed the loops.
That way I found the timing 'issue' in Loop 1 that I instantly attribute to the 2000xl cause I remembered this kind of inaccuracy in timing from my 2000 (inaccuracy when the sequence start over again).
I also invert polarity of the loops and checked them against each other.
The results sounded slightly different in level (I didn't cancel out 100%. Maybe because even with peak normalizing it's not 100% identical in level or the 44,1 samplingrate is not enough and wouldn't allow to align the waveforms 100%).
So what I did was just guessing
This is my speaker (and one of the reasons my mixes sounds like they do)
:fill(fff,true):upscale()/www.chip.de%2Fii%2F8%2F8%2F9%2F3%2F9%2F5%2F2%2F9%2Fcanton1-f42352f5a67c8efa.jpg)
Didn't used headphones whlie comparing
Yes, expectation and bias plays a big role. Just like in politics.
This is what I expect next: You post that you lied in your other post and that the loops ARE recorded in differnt MPCs
peace
CharlesRandolph wrote: Build a BOX, put the PO 33 inside, name it SP600. Then boom! Instant classic!
for SOME people this might work.



I took this test in the past and it really opened my ears to what I was listening too. The MPC do have a different sound, but nothing that is that different. 



