mwalker wrote:my music may s*ck but i went to berklee for 2 years, do you think you could get in?
So, if your music still sucks, what good did it do you? And to answer your question, it depends on the programs they have at berklee. I don't think I'd travel across the world (literally) to go to a school though, so it's a moot point.
mwalker wrote:if you take two individual with the same talent, for 1 year one of the individual each day practice scales (maj, min, chromatic etc) and chords (circle of 4th and 5th, maj, min, traid, 7th, 9th, 11th, 12th) for 30 min a day and the other individual just depended on there ear, who would make better tunes after on year?
One of them would be better at playing scales and chords. If that consitutes making better music is a matter of taste. There's no doubt Joe Satriani is a good guitar player, I just think his songs stink, all technique and no soul.
mwalker wrote:this is a pretty basic concept. THE MORE YOU KNOW THE BETTER YOUR MUSIC WILL SOUND (EVEN AFTER THE BUD WEARS OFF).
I think you're oversimplifying the issue. I don't want to promote ignorance, but intuition (or gut feeling if you will) shouldn't be overlooked as a vehicle of creativity. Your songs don't automatically get better just because you've been playing scales on the piano until your fingers bleed.
I spent 6 years taking lessons, and all it did was lock me up. Others may fare differently, but it's not a guaranteed fact.