By j-no
Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:10 pm
Ill-Green wrote:After bangin' the 500 much, I smoke a dutch and put my girl in a camel-clutch.
ouch.. the camel clutch... that's some Iron Shiek right there!!!
Ill-Green wrote:After bangin' the 500 much, I smoke a dutch and put my girl in a camel-clutch.

Jamon wrote:Between the nursery rhymes and irrelevant reactions there seems to be confusion.
The Akai MPC500 is unusable. Not imperfect, completely unusable for serious work.
Example.1. Turn on
2. Mode Load
3. Cursor Right , Data Wheel Right, Cursor Down, Do It
4. Pad 1, Do It
5. Track, Pad 1
The sample should be triggered, but it isn't. Why?6. Mode Program, Data Wheel Right
It isn't assigned!
Now imagine you are in a good mood and sit down to play something. You assign 12 samples, which requires a lot of turns and clicks, ...
ssnedden wrote::lol: people think they know everything the machine can do after using it for a month. dude who said FL Studio is better proved he doesn't know what a program is in another thread. But he knows enough to know it's "a piece of ****".

Dj Lucid wrote:ssnedden wrote::lol: people think they know everything the machine can do after using it for a month. dude who said FL Studio is better proved he doesn't know what a program is in another thread. But he knows enough to know it's "a piece of ****".
Huh? Talking to me?
I know what the program is and does.
As for the MPC500 not so much.
After reading the reviews you would probably agree that buying a instrument for $400-600 with bugs is concerning.
I can do just about everything the MPC500 can do with a program called Reaper. (Flip tails its Fl Studio, give or take)
Not to rag on the MPC (HELL I love it) but your just paying to be able to preform live or to show off.
However........
Programs are used just to emit sounds. Making it from scratch takes real skill and learning techniques to preform beat patterns.
Ill-Green wrote:You're Jamon's brother, right?
"Programs are used just to emit sounds. Making it from scratch takes real skill and learning techniques to preform beat patterns"
Dj Lucid wrote:Ill-Green wrote:You're Jamon's brother, right?
I am not.
Tapuno wrote:No, its not the fat **** I was supposed to **** but never did.
And, no that is not a dude. Its my sister.
Jamon wrote:
If Akai gave us the source code all of this would solve itself. I'm asking them to let me pop the hood to my own car. But they bolted it shut so only authorized personnel from their company can get in. People take it in to them, and they CAN'T FIX IT. Imagine if your car wasn't serviceable by you. Imagine if people weren't able to change parts, and custom modify it because the hood was welded shut with protection mechanisms. THEN YOU DON'T OWN IT. Just give us access to the engine under the hood of the product WE BOUGHT. JJ has access somehow, but if he didn't imagine how lame the MPCs would be.
Instead of taking attacks on Akai personally you should recognize the truth of the situation, that you have an unserviceable car that is known to break down randomly. Maybe it'll happen at the worst time for you and cause pain. Or maybe yours works perfectly, but if you had access to the engine you could tweak it to be even more to your liking. You don't want that? Akai doesn't listen until it hits their profits. People need to know that the MPC500 and 5000 are dependent on the shotty Akai OS, and the only reason why the 1000/2500 are hits is because of JJOS. Then they'll stop buying them, and Akai listens.