Technical questions for the MPC2000xl and the MPC2000
User avatar
By jonestown massacre Mon Feb 16, 2009 9:50 pm
Why would Akai care? They dont produce the unit or support it anymore......

I can see it taking a HUGE bite out of sales in the 500/1000/2500/5000 arena; that might be a problem though.....
User avatar
By peterpiper Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:17 pm
Hmm...... I wonder if Akai will sue the programmer of the JJOS in a few years when the sales of the 1000s and 2500s drop.
That would be a good move (commercial thought)

peace
By distantb Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:36 am
I dont get what you guys are saying about how jj's os does not keep sales of mpc's down. Would you buy a 2500k if you knew that your 1k with jj' os would have the more features for less!

I know i wouldnt
User avatar
By mr_debauch Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:45 am
distantb wrote:I dont get what you guys are saying about how jj's os does not keep sales of mpc's down. Would you buy a 2500k if you knew that your 1k with jj' os would have the more features for less!

I know i wouldnt



the fact remains.. the 2500 physically has more features then the 1000 regardless of OS...

you can make the comparison if both machines were running the akai OS.
User avatar
By zbigi Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:12 am
so is it too early to ask for a normalize function?
By gangreen Tue Feb 24, 2009 2:50 pm
os`kar wrote:no offence but i think that it would be hard for you to write the OS for an mpc.
usually it takes months for people (team)who know the hardware from the inside.
you propably dont know a lot about its internal hardware structure, how to make all the blocks work for you as you want it to.
what I mean JJ OS is made by a person who propably worked or still works for akai as a programmer, thats where he got the source from and could make it work better for a user.

even during dissasemblying of the software, you would get some blocks of the source code but you could also get in trouble as it is reverse engineering and if you used some parts of the code into your OS you still can`t sell it because its copywritten as well as the akai mpc 2000/2000xl design itself.

the mpc 2000/2000xl is a computer based hardware so this should make
it a bit easier, still i don`t think you or anybody else could do it 'like that'.
its not the thing of waking up in the morning and saying,'today im gonna make my own mpc Operating system' IMO.
peace.

Oskar


You're an inspiration to us all :) I mean it in a good way
User avatar
By jonestown massacre Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:35 pm
who doesnt want an updated os for the xl??
User avatar
By LOKI77 Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:20 pm
if you got your xl mastered and are sick with it ,why would u need more features ? unless maybe you cant grasp and manipulate the existing features which would mean.......... u suck!
User avatar
By jonestown massacre Sat Mar 21, 2009 9:46 am
^^^Once Ive "mastered" something I tend to want to move on and learn something new. If I "mastered" my MPC, I would want newer features to keep me thinking of new workflows/methods of creating.
User avatar
By DukeNewport Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:38 pm
Guess what's never coming out :?: :!: ???
User avatar
By zbigi Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:03 am
detox?
User avatar
By JUKE 179r Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:17 pm
zbigi wrote:detox?


LMBAO!!!!! :lol:
By gangreen Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:55 pm
Yo im hand-on IT but not a programmer, more of a scripter. But If theres anyhelp I can be, and YOU want to make this happen, PM me (Including web site hosting, marketing)