Reviews and questions about the entry-level MPC500
User avatar
By ssnedden Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:48 pm
fatkyle wrote:
ssnedden wrote: there's limited mixing options.


aka none.


You have volume, panning, and filter options for every sound and the ability to resample something with effects on it - "none" by today's standards but you can do enough on it.
By DjPound79 Tue Oct 21, 2008 11:02 pm
LOL@cats who arent satisfied with something like a 500 which is more than sufficient features wise.

what the hell do you guys want?? For it to print out sheet music too or something!?!

ha

ssnedden your beats are killer man....im totally feelin your stuff

peace
User avatar
By ssnedden Tue Oct 21, 2008 11:07 pm
DjPound79 wrote:LOL@cats who arent satisfied with something like a 500 which is more than sufficient features wise.

what the hell do you guys want?? For it to print out sheet music too or something!?!

ha

ssnedden your beats are killer man....im totally feelin your stuff

peace


8) thanks
User avatar
By Cold Snap Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:04 pm
fatkyle wrote:
ssnedden wrote: there's limited mixing options.


aka none.



I have to disagree w/ (aka none)...There's definitely mixing options on the 500...Basic ones but really the essential ones are there, just gotta know how to freak it n tweak it & you can get a pretty decent mix.
User avatar
By ssnedden Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:08 pm
Cold Snap wrote:
fatkyle wrote:
ssnedden wrote: there's limited mixing options.


aka none.



I have to disagree w/ (aka none)...There's definitely mixing options on the 500...Basic ones but really the essential ones are there, just gotta know how to freak it n tweak it & you can get a pretty decent mix.


Yeah, A MPC has more mixing options than a mixing board (the volume and pan of a board plus more) so I don't see the problem.
User avatar
By turbomoonie Wed Apr 08, 2009 7:15 am
i like the way all of the tracks sound. imo, its awesome to be able to mix tracks to sound crisp and clear...but everyon is doing that these days. i like the organic, grimey feel that all of your tracks seem to have. by all means, i dont overdo the "grittyness" if u will, but a healthy balance seems to have been struck here. i like it, this is wut music is about. everyone craves that vintage 2 track sound that made places like Hitsville famous. ur keepin it real. keep it pushin peace.

just my 2 sense :)
By logic_user99 Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:11 am
I can't listen to your shiz at work, Sned, but I have no doubt that it's uber-tight. I gotta give you props for working with the tools you have, and actually using a 'lesser' piece of gear to finish the product.

The 500 has plenty of scope for finishing tracks; you just have to get a bit creative with it! There's only one word that anyone really needs to know (hell, it's worth saying three times)...

RESAMPLE! RESAMPLE! RESAMPLE!
User avatar
By DPM Sat Apr 11, 2009 7:25 pm
good stuff...2nd was dope as shit...the last one was kinda off to me, like it had too much stuff playing at once it seemed. overall nice man!
By SNMTK Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:15 pm
downloading now... im sure theyll all bang

the limitations on the 500 are actually a blessing in disguise. forcing you to work with less often makes you concentrate on whats really hot... thats what ive found anyway
User avatar
By robthom Sat Apr 11, 2009 11:28 pm
Quick notes:
1. good, naked "foundation" beat. Needs lyrics.
2. Good beat. Good beat and baseline. Remove and/or change "Oooh" sample.
3. Didn't care for it. Nothing that cant be fixed. Bridge was interesting. (the part after "keep it on" is the bridge IMO)
4. Most interesting beat so far.
5. possibly hot. The kind of stuff that might make a mill with 2pac lyrics over it.
;)