Post your questions, opinions and reviews of the MPC1000. This forum is for discussion of the OFFICIAL Akai OS (2.1). If you wish to discuss the JJ OS, please use the dedicated JJ OS forum

By DEADLY MiND Fri Jul 30, 2004 1:58 am
I would choose hardware over software any day. Some people just feel that way. But id rather be lookin at a burned-out 2000 screen, then burnin my eyes out on a computer screen. yaknow?

Its kinda just preference.
Keys, mouse, and ok pads?
-or-
Buttons, wheels, and dope pads.

Ill go with the second one.

By JStruMENTAL Fri Jul 30, 2004 4:02 am
"Its kinda just preference.
Keys, mouse, and ok pads?
-or-
Buttons, wheels, and dope pads."

ima use that in a song!!

By mwalker Fri Jul 30, 2004 3:35 pm
personally, check out native instruments intakt. along with mpd-16 and cubase you will be set for awhile. in my opinion intakt is a combination of acid, battery and live3/4 (but not acid, battery or live 3/4). there is a learning curve but once you have it down to a science, well ... i own mpc and intakt with it features (effects, tempo sync, imports rex2 files, number of outputs, chopping the beat, mixing the different slices, plays up to 88 different samples, add effects to individual slice, go to the native instrument web site they have a demo avaible) will out preform a mpc any day. for as sequencing goes, cubase is a better sequencer than mpc. the mpc sequencer with the samplers and the pads are a great combination in one box but ... you could do more with cubase. except one thing which may be important to some is the note repeat (which is a great feature).

By sincere Fri Jul 30, 2004 3:55 pm
Intakt is a great piece of software. That an Mach5 should both be checked out in addition to the MPC.

By sampie Sat Jul 31, 2004 3:29 am
i think that the mpc1000 triggering NI Battery is a nice set up. It may just be me but for some reason drum samples coming out of battery and my Delta44 soundcard have more punch than the same samples coming out the mpc1000. I think it has to do with Battery's sound shaping algorithms -attack times, decay etc. The reason i started using Battery for the samples as opposed to the 1000 was because i could not tolerate that trim edit bug prior to os. 1.05. Both are good however so go with whatever you could afford.

By SPOSDA THE GREAT Sat Jul 31, 2004 7:06 pm
What was the trimming bug? Many samples I have loaded to the mpc have clicks which trim will not remove.. Is this the bug? I updated to 1.05 and the old samples still sound the same. Do i have re-load them to lose the pops?

Thnx-J

By sampie Sat Jul 31, 2004 8:20 pm
the trimming bug was a bug prior to 1.05. When you would trim a mono sample in the trim edit mode and discard the unused portion the following sample would have a clickin noise at the end of it. So i got frustrated and started using Battery for samples and the mpc to sequence.