By nowaysj
Sat Nov 14, 2009 8:46 am
I'd like to say thanks for this forum, been reading and taking in so much in the last week.
I'm a total mpc newb, never even used one really.
Used Mpc prices have dropped to the point where I can actually afford one.
I've been researching all of the different models, and have received some advice regarding which model would meet my needs. Ideally I'd like someone who knows the boxes to show me each one and what it's about, but that shit isn't happening.
I'm looking for a stable machine that isn't flakey has a hard drive and talks to the computer.
So I'm pretty close to deciding on the 4000. I don't need the multisample keygroup features at all, I've got soft synths for those types of things. But what I do have is about a 60 gig library of samples and probably half are 24 bit. I'd like to use these in the Mpc. So rather than constantly converting samples I'm thinking the 4000 would suit my needs.
I also like that it's the former (current, depending on who you talk to ;P ) flagship product from akai, that means hightest quality parts and design (or so it should).
I've also heard the pads on the 4000 have the best touch. This is very important to me. I've got the mpk49, and those pads are unusable. I've tested other units, and they're not as bad as mine, but they still suck it.
I've also heard that the 4000 has the best sound of the Mpc's. This is also very important to me. I'm from an asr-x background, and if you know that box, it's got killer sound.
BUT
I'm a little worried that the 4k is more than I need in terms of functionality. I'm coming from a computer based background, and I feel like I'm pretty close to master level with my particular workflow. But I'm not having any fun anymore on the computer.
Ideally I'd be working on both the mpc and the comp. The mpc as an instrument really. I want to start playing my parts again, rather than drawing and all of the other "conveniences" that the computer has to offer.
But I don't want to climb Mt. Everest just to have some fun, feel me?
So is the 4k really that laborious to program versus the other akais - such as the 2500, 2000xl, 5000?
I want to get sounds into the mpc as fast as possible, get them chopped up, mapped out and start playing and arranging with as little trouble as possible. I'm not looking for a free ride but if that process is too difficult, I know I'm just gonna go back to the computer.
So again, I'd like to test this stuff out first, but I don't really have that option right now, so I'm relying on your opinions to help guide me in this very important decision.
I mean it sincerely, thank you!
I'm a total mpc newb, never even used one really.
Used Mpc prices have dropped to the point where I can actually afford one.
I've been researching all of the different models, and have received some advice regarding which model would meet my needs. Ideally I'd like someone who knows the boxes to show me each one and what it's about, but that shit isn't happening.
I'm looking for a stable machine that isn't flakey has a hard drive and talks to the computer.
So I'm pretty close to deciding on the 4000. I don't need the multisample keygroup features at all, I've got soft synths for those types of things. But what I do have is about a 60 gig library of samples and probably half are 24 bit. I'd like to use these in the Mpc. So rather than constantly converting samples I'm thinking the 4000 would suit my needs.
I also like that it's the former (current, depending on who you talk to ;P ) flagship product from akai, that means hightest quality parts and design (or so it should).
I've also heard the pads on the 4000 have the best touch. This is very important to me. I've got the mpk49, and those pads are unusable. I've tested other units, and they're not as bad as mine, but they still suck it.
I've also heard that the 4000 has the best sound of the Mpc's. This is also very important to me. I'm from an asr-x background, and if you know that box, it's got killer sound.
BUT
I'm a little worried that the 4k is more than I need in terms of functionality. I'm coming from a computer based background, and I feel like I'm pretty close to master level with my particular workflow. But I'm not having any fun anymore on the computer.
Ideally I'd be working on both the mpc and the comp. The mpc as an instrument really. I want to start playing my parts again, rather than drawing and all of the other "conveniences" that the computer has to offer.
But I don't want to climb Mt. Everest just to have some fun, feel me?
So is the 4k really that laborious to program versus the other akais - such as the 2500, 2000xl, 5000?
I want to get sounds into the mpc as fast as possible, get them chopped up, mapped out and start playing and arranging with as little trouble as possible. I'm not looking for a free ride but if that process is too difficult, I know I'm just gonna go back to the computer.
So again, I'd like to test this stuff out first, but I don't really have that option right now, so I'm relying on your opinions to help guide me in this very important decision.
I mean it sincerely, thank you!




