Post your questions, opinions and reviews of the MPC1000. This forum is for discussion of the OFFICIAL Akai OS (2.1). If you wish to discuss the JJ OS, please use the dedicated JJ OS forum
By CAN Wed Aug 18, 2004 2:56 am
I am quite torn between the 2

i am leaning towards the 1000 mainly
because of size and price

is is worth spending the extra cash for the 2000?
User avatar
By esskodebeatz Wed Aug 18, 2004 3:08 am
CAN wrote:I am quite torn between the 2

i am leaning towards the 1000 mainly
because of size and price

is is worth spending the extra cash for the 2000?


yup.

ess.
User avatar

By beyondhope1 Wed Aug 18, 2004 3:19 am
i say get the 1000 i feel the 2k is going to be obsolete soon and the 1k is going to be upgrade mad..
User avatar

By MattMatiks PG Wed Aug 18, 2004 3:20 am
2000
User avatar

By beyondhope1 Wed Aug 18, 2004 3:44 am
The 2000 is not even in manufactor.

or are u talking about the 2kxl.

Even if so im still with the 1k

By CAN Wed Aug 18, 2004 5:37 am
well the old 2k versus the new 1k?
there about the same price right?
User avatar

By MANiK Fri Aug 20, 2004 4:23 am
Let me put it this way:

I had a 60II several years ago (and STILL kick my own ass for selling it...I was too into computer sequencing at the time as it was all the new rage). I bought a 1000 a couple months ago. Within a month I got sick of all the timing problems and the poor build quality of the 1000 and swapped it for a 2000xl. The difference is amazing. The pads alone are pretty much worth the price. The pads on the 1000 are almost ALWAYS way out of calibration. I found myself recalibrating their sensitivity every two or three days. The good news is they do "break in" but it takes awhile. The other thing is that the 1000 doesn't do zoning. At all.....

Bottom line, if you're not hard on gear and use a computer for a lot of your production, a 1000 will do the job, but if you work without being tethered to a computer and/or are hard on your gear, the 2000xl is the logical choice. It all comes down to the way YOU work. I myself wouldn't go back to the 1000 unless they fixed a LOT of bugs and added several missing features, but it IS a fun little box, too. Just not nearly as capable as the 2000xl fitted with a zip drive or a CF reader...

Just my 2.

Peace,
MANiK

By JStruMENTAL Fri Aug 20, 2004 4:39 am
the mpc2000 is cheaper than the 1000

By CAN Fri Aug 20, 2004 5:49 am
Im basically looking for an mpc to function more as like an individual instrument, in other words i just want to make drum beats, and sample stuff, which i would then send to my computer for protools or live sequencing....

based on that what would be a better one for me??


also these damn problems and bugs w/ the 1000
are really starting to turn me off to buying it..

i mean i just want something that can be consistent, is that
too much to ask for????
User avatar

By MANiK Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 am
CAN wrote:Im basically looking for an mpc to function more as like an individual instrument, in other words i just want to make drum beats, and sample stuff, which i would then send to my computer for protools or live sequencing....

based on that what would be a better one for me??


also these damn problems and bugs w/ the 1000
are really starting to turn me off to buying it..

i mean i just want something that can be consistent, is that
too much to ask for????



If you are looking for an all in one box for drums and don't want to keep swapping files back and forth from your computer to timestretch or chop, etc., then the 2000xl is ideal. As far as the bugs on the 1000, though, remember that when the 2000 first came out it had tons of weird bugs too. People were comparing it to the 3000 like it was a worthless machine. It still has a couple of bugs, but they're much more minor than before. The 1000 is now in this same position. OS updates WILL fix a lot of the bugs in the machine over time, but remember it took the 2000 several years to get to the point it's at now, and it's pretty solid. Not to say it NEVER crashes, but not frequently at all. Certainly less than most software sequencers (especially those running on Windows....). I think eventually the 1000 will be a solid unit (though it still has a lesser build quality than the rest of the MPC line), but this will take awhile. By the way, a short fall WILL break off the plastic side panels (it happened to me when my gear bag's strap broke). Any other MPC would probably survive the fall with a minor scratch....fortunately the 1000's plastic panels are actually quite cheap to replace. Also consider since the 1000 is the "new kid on the block" for Akai, it is likely to get more attention as far as upgrades and support go than the 2000 series, but they MIGHT just pull the same trick they did with the 2000 and release a "1000xl" with the upgrades, most of which could truly have been in software, just like the 2000 classic. Adding things like timestretch and zoning, etc, is trivial at worst, and could EASILY be accomplished in software. They've said they'll add timestretch to the 1000 in a "future upgrade", but once again, the upgrade could easily be a new model, instead of the more reasonable software upgrade that they COULD DO.

It's all about whether you want an older machine that's more stable and truly an industry standard, or if you want to get with the latest technology and tiny size of the 1000 and wait for the bugs to get ironed out. Also, it has been noted in the 2000 forums that Akai is going to be releasing a compact flash upgrade for the 2000xl in a couple months, so if you would only buy it for the CF storage option, I'd recommend holding out for the 2000xl upgrade. Just my .02.

Peace to y'all...

MANiK

By Fro-D Sat Aug 21, 2004 5:09 pm
Go for the 1000!!
Due to its portability, price and power.
I was scared of bugs when i got my 1000 too but mine seems to be free off bugs and i dont think there is so many that have bugs actually.
And in the next os there comes timestretch and other abilities so.. go for the 1000 even if it is talk about the 2000xl or the old 2000...

sorry the misspelling, i'm norwegian