By vito
Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:27 pm
hi every one.
bin saving my beans gonna be getting my first mpc in the next couple of months
cant decide between the 2000xl and 2500
the obvious choice is the2500 coz the has the conectivity and storage bennefits, loading speed etc. with jj os the patched phrasing looks nifty also. and i can imagine at times a grid editor would be usefull. out of the two just due to the fact that my s3000xl is giving me a bad neck i would get the 2500 over the 1000 coz of the tilt screen alone.
but on the other hand i go on youtube and see people like aswell and jel playing live and see that they are using 2000xl. and these are guys who must of spent years refining their craft. and they have not felt the need to "change up" to a 1000 or a 2500.
can this be down to the pads. because for the live stuff they do they have found the 1000 and 2500 pads to be inferior maybe? do they not stand up to the hammering or are they less responsive or simply not as nice feeling? or maybe the pad placement to the centre instead of the right is an issue?
another pro on the 2000xl is that it can send up to 300000 midi messages in a song, i think its only 100000 with the 1000 and 2500.- this would be an issue for me as have alot of external stuff to control.
also, not sure where i read this but i think i did somewhere that the ppqn resolution is less on the 1000 and 2500, not sure though.
these two issues seem really strange for later models of an iconic machine thats territory was as a MIDI production center after all. to reduce the upper limit of midi messages and reduce the ppqn res wich is important for organic natural sounding sequences, just seems a wierd thing to do.
i also think the 2000xl is a beautifull looking machine and it can obviously stand the test of time(putting liney screens to one side)
aesthetics is a terrible reason to buy one peice of hardware over another tho... hmm
i wish i could try them both out but all the shops round here only stock mpd controllers so no mpc floor models..nada
i know this subject has been done to death in other threads but if any one could shed any light on Why the pros are still using 2000xl id really appreciate hearing opinions.
so if you have the option to use both but stick wit the 2kxl give us your 2c
bin saving my beans gonna be getting my first mpc in the next couple of months
cant decide between the 2000xl and 2500
the obvious choice is the2500 coz the has the conectivity and storage bennefits, loading speed etc. with jj os the patched phrasing looks nifty also. and i can imagine at times a grid editor would be usefull. out of the two just due to the fact that my s3000xl is giving me a bad neck i would get the 2500 over the 1000 coz of the tilt screen alone.
but on the other hand i go on youtube and see people like aswell and jel playing live and see that they are using 2000xl. and these are guys who must of spent years refining their craft. and they have not felt the need to "change up" to a 1000 or a 2500.
can this be down to the pads. because for the live stuff they do they have found the 1000 and 2500 pads to be inferior maybe? do they not stand up to the hammering or are they less responsive or simply not as nice feeling? or maybe the pad placement to the centre instead of the right is an issue?
another pro on the 2000xl is that it can send up to 300000 midi messages in a song, i think its only 100000 with the 1000 and 2500.- this would be an issue for me as have alot of external stuff to control.
also, not sure where i read this but i think i did somewhere that the ppqn resolution is less on the 1000 and 2500, not sure though.
these two issues seem really strange for later models of an iconic machine thats territory was as a MIDI production center after all. to reduce the upper limit of midi messages and reduce the ppqn res wich is important for organic natural sounding sequences, just seems a wierd thing to do.
i also think the 2000xl is a beautifull looking machine and it can obviously stand the test of time(putting liney screens to one side)
aesthetics is a terrible reason to buy one peice of hardware over another tho... hmm
i wish i could try them both out but all the shops round here only stock mpd controllers so no mpc floor models..nada
i know this subject has been done to death in other threads but if any one could shed any light on Why the pros are still using 2000xl id really appreciate hearing opinions.
so if you have the option to use both but stick wit the 2kxl give us your 2c












