By gosh
Thu Mar 18, 2010 10:28 am
Hi
I’ve been considering an MPC 4000. I have a 2500 already and I use it primarily for live performance – mainly electronic music – that includes several synths and an elektron machinedrum all synced/sequenced from it. I have JJOS2XL and it works great – the only downside to it is that as I’m keeping most of my stuff as midi I find that fitting my synths in the mix live a little hard – I would benefit from having more lines pre-recorded in (after they have been through eq, compression and effects etc) – I already have a load of drum breaks chopped up and when I’m starting to record in some of my synth lines I’m finding I’m running out of the 128mb RAM quite quickly. Yes I know 128mb ram is loads but when in comparision with say a ableton user I find it harder to make my live-sets have that polished edge that they get from having pre-recorded/mastered parts…so, I’ve begun looking at Maschine and the MPC4000 to have more space for pre-recorded parts..that got me thinking..
What I like about MPC4000 is obviously the 512mb ram (would be plenty for my live-set) and also the fact it’s a full on sampler – I’ve been getting more into sampling and I find the 2500 is great but what annoys me is the lack of hands-on with the 2500. I can create an instrument patch that uses an LFO to affect the filter for example but then I can’t automate the speed of the LFO by modwheel of Q-Link for example. The 4000’s 64Point mod-patch seems cool.
I also like the idea of more (and most importantly automatable effects) on the 4000 but I have a few questions that I’d really appreciate if people could answer.. I’ve read the manual but it’s hard without having the MPC in front of you!
The 4000 has 6 q-link controllers and they are assigned per-multi not per program correct? I’m worried that I won’t have enough q-links per set for hands on control. Can you set it up so you have a different multi in each sequence? Are the q-links functional when you are in track-mute mode?
Also…you if you assign them to a parameter and then record into a track a movement of that q-link controller does it record just the q-link data or will it record the actual parameter data. Ie. You assign q-link1 to control the lfo-speed for example and record some movement into a sequence. If you then assign q-link to something else will lfo-speed still change or will the new parameter change? If the latter occurs is there a work around for this – Can you use q-link to stack lots of variations up? How does it work for recording midi-cc for sending to external devices?
My second question is regarding the effects.. Are they saved as part of the multi or are they global? If you change to a sequence that loads a new multi (is this even possible?) will the effects change too. If not can you change effects whilst the sequencer is running etc? And with that – what operations can’t be done with the sequencer running?
Sorry for the massive email – I’m trialing Maschine at the weekend and although I don’t really want to use a computer some of the benefits are great (better sample management and effects/ hands-on control). However, if MPC4000 can act very similar I’m tempted to stick in hardware land..if you could answer some of my questions I’d really appreciate.
Thanks
Geoff
I’ve been considering an MPC 4000. I have a 2500 already and I use it primarily for live performance – mainly electronic music – that includes several synths and an elektron machinedrum all synced/sequenced from it. I have JJOS2XL and it works great – the only downside to it is that as I’m keeping most of my stuff as midi I find that fitting my synths in the mix live a little hard – I would benefit from having more lines pre-recorded in (after they have been through eq, compression and effects etc) – I already have a load of drum breaks chopped up and when I’m starting to record in some of my synth lines I’m finding I’m running out of the 128mb RAM quite quickly. Yes I know 128mb ram is loads but when in comparision with say a ableton user I find it harder to make my live-sets have that polished edge that they get from having pre-recorded/mastered parts…so, I’ve begun looking at Maschine and the MPC4000 to have more space for pre-recorded parts..that got me thinking..
What I like about MPC4000 is obviously the 512mb ram (would be plenty for my live-set) and also the fact it’s a full on sampler – I’ve been getting more into sampling and I find the 2500 is great but what annoys me is the lack of hands-on with the 2500. I can create an instrument patch that uses an LFO to affect the filter for example but then I can’t automate the speed of the LFO by modwheel of Q-Link for example. The 4000’s 64Point mod-patch seems cool.
I also like the idea of more (and most importantly automatable effects) on the 4000 but I have a few questions that I’d really appreciate if people could answer.. I’ve read the manual but it’s hard without having the MPC in front of you!
The 4000 has 6 q-link controllers and they are assigned per-multi not per program correct? I’m worried that I won’t have enough q-links per set for hands on control. Can you set it up so you have a different multi in each sequence? Are the q-links functional when you are in track-mute mode?
Also…you if you assign them to a parameter and then record into a track a movement of that q-link controller does it record just the q-link data or will it record the actual parameter data. Ie. You assign q-link1 to control the lfo-speed for example and record some movement into a sequence. If you then assign q-link to something else will lfo-speed still change or will the new parameter change? If the latter occurs is there a work around for this – Can you use q-link to stack lots of variations up? How does it work for recording midi-cc for sending to external devices?
My second question is regarding the effects.. Are they saved as part of the multi or are they global? If you change to a sequence that loads a new multi (is this even possible?) will the effects change too. If not can you change effects whilst the sequencer is running etc? And with that – what operations can’t be done with the sequencer running?
Sorry for the massive email – I’m trialing Maschine at the weekend and although I don’t really want to use a computer some of the benefits are great (better sample management and effects/ hands-on control). However, if MPC4000 can act very similar I’m tempted to stick in hardware land..if you could answer some of my questions I’d really appreciate.
Thanks
Geoff


