By dmarz45
Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:20 am
That is definitely not a sample.. I wonder if they used live instruments to make that shit. It would be very hard to make that great sounding orchestra sample using vsts...
By Clint
Wed Jul 07, 2010 10:56 am
By dmarz45
Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:51 pm
yeah I watched that... He said his boy makes sample quality music... But how did that guy make it? With real instruments?
By W. Steele
Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:03 pm
Straight bullsh!t . So now sampling someone's music that was never on vinyl and you didn't have to dig for and is not famous and you happen to know them makes sampling "not sampling" . . . . . bullsh!t 
.
sam·ple (smpl)
n.
1.
a. A portion, piece, or segment that is representative of a whole.
b. An entity that is representative of a class; a specimen. See Synonyms at example.
2. Statistics A set of elements drawn from and analyzed to estimate the characteristics of a population. Also called sampling.
3. A usually digitized audio segment taken from an original recording and inserted, often repetitively, in a new recording.
tr.v. sam·pled, sam·pling, sam·ples
1. To take a sample of, especially to test or examine by a sample: the restaurant critic who must sample a little of everything.
2. To use or incorporate (an audio segment of an original recording) in a new recording
Edit : To answer the question . . . he sampled someone .
.sam·ple (smpl)
n.
1.
a. A portion, piece, or segment that is representative of a whole.
b. An entity that is representative of a class; a specimen. See Synonyms at example.
2. Statistics A set of elements drawn from and analyzed to estimate the characteristics of a population. Also called sampling.
3. A usually digitized audio segment taken from an original recording and inserted, often repetitively, in a new recording.
tr.v. sam·pled, sam·pling, sam·ples
1. To take a sample of, especially to test or examine by a sample: the restaurant critic who must sample a little of everything.
2. To use or incorporate (an audio segment of an original recording) in a new recording
Edit : To answer the question . . . he sampled someone .
By boxcutter butta
Thu Jul 08, 2010 1:14 am
i read some where he didn't even make the intro which is the only notable part of the song
By DPM
Thu Jul 08, 2010 4:18 am
could be either or, but i honestly dont think its live
MPC 1000 + Sp303 + Numark NDX 400 + Proteus 2000
"Keep it movin'..."
http://www.youtube.com/illestbeats02
"Keep it movin'..."
http://www.youtube.com/illestbeats02
By BGBEATS
Thu Jul 08, 2010 12:32 pm
It's similiar to what Beck did on his album "The information"
he had musicians jam out & he recorded it then sampled chopped and re arranged the jam sessions .
It's sampling, just not sampling and clearing a copyrighted commercial release that other people can go dig up.
it would be like back in the day at motown if somebody would had sampled some of the funk brothers jam sessions into an mpc (didn't exist yet) and flipped it for james brown.
he had musicians jam out & he recorded it then sampled chopped and re arranged the jam sessions .
It's sampling, just not sampling and clearing a copyrighted commercial release that other people can go dig up.
it would be like back in the day at motown if somebody would had sampled some of the funk brothers jam sessions into an mpc (didn't exist yet) and flipped it for james brown.
By happyhour
Thu Jul 08, 2010 7:33 pm
Beastie's a famous for that as well.
Wouldn't/shouldn't the guy who made the instrumental be given credit? The way it's explained in the interview it sounds like that dude did most the work. Unless he wants to be an unsung hero.
Wouldn't/shouldn't the guy who made the instrumental be given credit? The way it's explained in the interview it sounds like that dude did most the work. Unless he wants to be an unsung hero.
By Clint
Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:10 pm
enrole wrote:who cares
Exactly.