
By Menco
Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:05 pm
So basically we have two leaders now:
The 3000 for it's claimed sound and groove.
The 4000 for it's functionality.
About the sound and groove of the 3000 there's an everlasting discussion. I must say, IMO each sampler has it own sound. My s3000 sounds fatter then my mpc 2500 when playing back beats straight out the box. After recording and mixing one doesn't sound worse then the other.
The 4000 has so many functions people get lost with that one. Or people simply don't need that many functions.
Sound versus funtionality. This is a never ending discussion.
The 3000 for it's claimed sound and groove.
The 4000 for it's functionality.
About the sound and groove of the 3000 there's an everlasting discussion. I must say, IMO each sampler has it own sound. My s3000 sounds fatter then my mpc 2500 when playing back beats straight out the box. After recording and mixing one doesn't sound worse then the other.
The 4000 has so many functions people get lost with that one. Or people simply don't need that many functions.
Sound versus funtionality. This is a never ending discussion.






