Forum to discuss all matters relating to the MPC1000 and MPC2500 operating systems created by 'JJ' (all versions).

What feature request would you like to see in the next update.

1
5%
0
N/A
3
14%
3
14%
0
N/A
8
36%
4
18%
3
14%
User avatar
By bliprock Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:53 pm
hhhmmmm, im not really feeling for any of em really. Maybe the lock out function, so no save, load, looper access when playing. Least thats what i think it means yeah
User avatar
By bliprock Tue Jan 17, 2012 6:44 am
innovine wrote:Does JJ pay any attention to these polls, or does he just do what he feels like?

Please try and be objective innovine. Not everyone wants the same thing and use the MPC in different ways. So for example, the looper - Some of us love it, and some of us hate it for what ever reason. JJOSXL aint gonna make you a coffee in the morning, and its not gonna make music making process perfect or instant, but closer than alot of other things sure, but it has to be a considered change that works for everyone. Also consider it takes time to develop and write, test ect. So patience is a virtue and I a sure he will consider many things. If anything he probably lurks around and reads stuff and what others may also say to him. I'm guessing but its a reasonable idea, and so JJOSXL gets developed more. Also you have to realise not every idea seems good to every one, and thats why we have these discussions right.
I dont get upset if everyone dosnt agree, or get annoyed my idea is not implemented. And there is a few things I have posted about things like Phase invert and not liking the looper but you just bump em once in a while and try to engage with the community more. If you idea is really good, or is seen as a benefit by us we will be behind it right. just my 2 cents
User avatar
By m:t:c Tue Jan 17, 2012 7:08 am
Just looking at the rate of updates I doubt that JJ's actually reading these forums. IMO the most efficient way would be to discuss bugs & features here and once they're agreed upon someone (nym?) would report them to JJ.
By innovine Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:43 pm
bliprock wrote:
innovine wrote:Does JJ pay any attention to these polls, or does he just do what he feels like?

Please try and be objective innovine.


It was a perfectly objective question. I know JJ doesn't have to do anything, just as I don't have to buy his software. But there's no point getting involved in discussions and making suggestions if JJ is not paying attention and is simply developing whatever features he feels like, or deems most sellable.
Last edited by innovine on Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
By dtaa pla muk Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:57 pm
when making FRs, it helps to remember that the features that are most likely to be implemented are the features that tweak existing features...workflow improvements especially.

instead of trying to bend jjos to fit your ideal workflow, you've gotta bend yourself around jjos.

this poll is certainly not going to sway jj one way or another. it's more for us, and even then, it reflects a very small percentage of jjos users/betatesters.
By jimmie Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:04 am
I want JJ to return the behaviour of the STEP buttons in GRID back to how they were a few versions ago. Pressing STEP took you to the next hit without you having to be on the same line as it.