Wondering if this is a bug or is it my machine

Hey guys I am using jjos2xl and I tried jjos1 and it does the same thing. Say I load up a sample in trim menu and set it to any amount of chops through f3 slice , the last slice will always be one less digit then the end of the sample: ie. if the whole sample has 0030239 of an end point then the last chop will end in 0030238, it will not go to 0330239. I tried this in Non-Destructive Chop mode and it does not do this. Can anyone please shed some light on this , it is really bugging me.

Could some please turn on there machine and slice something and tell me if the same thing occurs, I would be very thankful. I reverted to akai os and this issue does not happen...very weird, so I am guessing it is not just my machine.

-Edit- I was not able to replicate it in free jjos either so it only happens in the paid jjos versions which all of them slice in stereo and free jj and akai dont maybe it has something to do with that?

Yes, but is this causing some audible problems to your chops? Did you know that you can extract samples if you've chopped them in NDC mode? Make a chop and [SHIFT]+[F2] to extract.

No it is not I am just wondering if it is my machine. So when you say yes this is my machine or does it happen to you as well?

ok

I just loaded an audio sample, length 100 000 samples.
Chopped/sliced it into 2 regions, and I get what you have described. Does not happen in NDC mode.

Ah sorry... "yes" meant that it happens here too.

yes i know it doesnt happen in ndc . Just to clarify for you it happens where i say but not in ndc mode correct?

How has no one else noticed this before?

tomc3084 wrote:end in 0030238, it will not go to 0330239.

+1 (BC)*.

tomc3084 wrote: Can anyone please shed some light on this.

(**)

tomc3084 wrote:How has no one else noticed this before?

(***)

___________________________________________________________


(*)= Before Christ
(**)= This result is not adaptive (0030238 is not correct, I think).
(***)= (*)+(**)


thanks for all your atention.

Hi Sally, I know you are trying to be funny, but it does not help anything whatsoever.
What do u mean by this result is not adaptive.

tomc3084 wrote:Hi Sally, I know you are trying to be funny,










What do u mean by this result is not adaptive.

Nothing specially for you, I see.

You were very helpful, thanks for that