Bug reports & end-user support for Akai's MPC Software 'controllers' including the new MPC Studio 2, the MPC Touch, MPC Renaissance & original MPC Studio and MPC StudioB lack.
By jocks Tue Apr 03, 2012 2:18 pm
hi, I asked the akai crew in renaissance thread if we could buy the software without hardware controllers. to be used for owners of newer hardware mpc´s: the answer was "sorry no" :(
No clear signs that the OS for mpc will be updated with bug fixes, or for use with renaissance software either...
By GodDevilWhatever Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:58 pm
Battery 3 or any DAW can do what the MPC Renaissance does. It's kind of dumb to not go one step further and have features that DAWs don't do, or do them better. A lot more people would buy the controller if it was standalone or connected to a computer. Paying 1200 bucks for a midi controller with knobs is **** ing retarded. Maschine already did it and charges half the MPC. It feels like a large part of the MPC Renaissance controller is going to waste because it has to be connected to a computer all the time.

Why not the best of both worlds? When the **** will Akai learn. This is what puts top tier companies where they are and second tier companies that have to have their customers make a hacked OS for their own product(JJOs). At least take a look at history and learn from it. Akai! Don't let the Renaissance be a flop, let it be a standalone and computer integrated production center/controller!
Last edited by GodDevilWhatever on Wed Apr 04, 2012 12:59 am, edited 8 times in total.
By strugglebuggiemusic Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:19 pm
GodDevilWhatever wrote:Battery 3 or any DAW can do what the MPC Renaissance does. It's kind of dumb to not go one step further and have features that DAWs don't do, or do them better. A lot more people would buy the controller if it was standalone or connected to a computer. Paying 1200 bucks for a midi controller with knobs is **** retarded. Maschine already did it and charges half the MPC. It feels like a large part of the MPC Renaissance controller is going to waste because it has to be connected to a computer all the time.

Why not the best of both worlds? When the **** will Akai learn. This is what puts top tier companies where they are and second tier companies that have to have customer make a custom hacked OS for their own product. At least take a look at history and learn from it. Akai! Don't let the Renaissance be a flop, let it be standalone both computer integrated!


Ahem...
If you truly want the "standalone" experience (which i doubt you know anything about) then I suggest you buy the MPC STUDIO, a MAC mini, without a monitor, or better yet, just disconnect the monitor on your current setup, OR, throw a towel over it, OR, if ya wanna get super-duper-creative, spray paint it black, so ya cant see nothing but that little LCD screen...

As always,
I remain:
2KOOL4SKOOL 8)
By GodDevilWhatever Tue Apr 03, 2012 10:32 pm
You're completely dismissing the fact that the MPC Renaissance could be the best of both worlds, but you'd rather spend your time insulting someone you've never met. I've been with Akai since 1997 and DJing years before that.

What I'm trying to have conveyed is that the MPC has the circuit boards that can have it a standalone but they aren't being utilized. **** it, at this point, I'm sure we'll just hack the OS and create a better one like the JJOs.

Peace.
By strugglebuggiemusic Tue Apr 03, 2012 10:51 pm
GodDevilWhatever wrote:You're completely dismissing the fact that the MPC Renaissance could be the best of both worlds, but you'd rather spend your time insulting someone you've never met. I've been with Akai since 1997 and DJing years before that.

What I'm trying to have conveyed is that the MPC has the circuit boards that can have it a standalone but they aren't being utilized. **** it, at this point, I'm sure we'll just hack the OS and create a better one like the JJOs.

Peace.


Sorry, man, I was just trying to be funny...
By mcroepster Tue Apr 03, 2012 10:59 pm
strugglebuggiemusic wrote:
GodDevilWhatever wrote:Battery 3 or any DAW can do what the MPC Renaissance does. It's kind of dumb to not go one step further and have features that DAWs don't do, or do them better. A lot more people would buy the controller if it was standalone or connected to a computer. Paying 1200 bucks for a midi controller with knobs is **** retarded. Maschine already did it and charges half the MPC. It feels like a large part of the MPC Renaissance controller is going to waste because it has to be connected to a computer all the time.

Why not the best of both worlds? When the **** will Akai learn. This is what puts top tier companies where they are and second tier companies that have to have customer make a custom hacked OS for their own product. At least take a look at history and learn from it. Akai! Don't let the Renaissance be a flop, let it be standalone both computer integrated!


Ahem...
If you truly want the "standalone" experience (which i doubt you know anything about) then I suggest you buy the MPC STUDIO, a MAC mini, without a monitor, or better yet, just disconnect the monitor on your current setup, OR, throw a towel over it, OR, if ya wanna get super-duper-creative, spray paint it black, so ya cant see nothing but that little LCD screen...

As always,
I remain:
2KOOL4SKOOL 8)

strugglebuggiemusic wrote:
GodDevilWhatever wrote:You're completely dismissing the fact that the MPC Renaissance could be the best of both worlds, but you'd rather spend your time insulting someone you've never met. I've been with Akai since 1997 and DJing years before that.

What I'm trying to have conveyed is that the MPC has the circuit boards that can have it a standalone but they aren't being utilized. **** it, at this point, I'm sure we'll just hack the OS and create a better one like the JJOs.

Peace.


Sorry, man, I was just trying to be funny...


GodDevilWhatever wrote:lol


:lol: :lol:
User avatar
By Lampdog Wed Apr 04, 2012 12:49 am
Shit got serious, mad, them funny all under 3 seconds. :lol: