advice: don't use it in realtime on inputs, use it on recorded audio.
but yes, i use it.
i prefer reaEQ as a utility knife, but reafir is cool as sh!t and useful for surgery.
the ReaPlugs are my first line of defense. i have a very soft hand when it comes to FX...my most often used 2 are reaEQ and reaComp. transparent, flexible, and unobtrusive. highly recommended.
By dtaa pla muk
Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:52 pm

By peterpiper
Mon Apr 23, 2012 11:58 pm
I use this filter sometimes. Never heard any weird stuff and it seems that this filter is very accurate in phase
http://mailconf.wiwi.uni-karlsruhe.de/a ... ement.html
sorry its in german but you probably get enough info out of the pics.
peace
http://mailconf.wiwi.uni-karlsruhe.de/a ... ement.html
sorry its in german but you probably get enough info out of the pics.
peace

By jonestown massacre
Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:20 am
I translated with a add on in firefox. Good article, thanks!
nogginj wrote:sometimes you make too much sense too early jones and it leaves us blinded ;]

By AntonPD
Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:10 pm
i translated with NO add on in chrome
good read
nym, why do you advise it only on recorded audio?
this dude (second gray rectangle) uses something similar (i think. pro audio dsp dynamic spectrum mapping) for..
everything
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/music-co ... in-33.html
good read
nym, why do you advise it only on recorded audio?
this dude (second gray rectangle) uses something similar (i think. pro audio dsp dynamic spectrum mapping) for..
everything
By brucker
Wed Apr 25, 2012 7:45 am
loves the reafir!
dunno about nym but i like to have all the data there recorded first, and then i'll use reafir mostly for sub 30hz surgery.
nebula filters and shit come after.
dunno about nym but i like to have all the data there recorded first, and then i'll use reafir mostly for sub 30hz surgery.
nebula filters and shit come after.

