
By TheUnfuckwithable
Wed May 16, 2012 11:16 am
inflict3 wrote:ive learned just from being on the phone with akai/numark not to trust them..
I agree 100%.


inflict3 wrote:ive learned just from being on the phone with akai/numark not to trust them..

jpeg wrote:i aint used reason since like version 3 but i could neva get into it but i do like it i prolly need to sit and spend time with it but the way i do beats is so simple i dont need many of the advanced feature u lot use.
and i need the hands on aspect to really connect with the beat and program the drums
Tapuno wrote:No, its not the fat **** I was supposed to **** but never did.
And, no that is not a dude. Its my sister.
JAH wrote:jpeg wrote:in waht respect is maschine software behind reason 6
Really? I can think of numerous ways. They only advantages Maschine has over Reason is its dedicated integrated controller and support for 3rd party VST effects. Reason is a beast. I wish Akai adds some way to integrate Reason with the MPC Ren.
JAH wrote:jpeg wrote:in waht respect is maschine software behind reason 6They only advantages Maschine has over Reason is its dedicated integrated controller and support for 3rd party VST effects.
DJ Premier wrote:...A lot of new cats out now do not know the history.
JAH wrote:I wish Akai adds some way to integrate Reason with the MPC Ren.reason will be "integrated" when akai release a REN os update to include rewire then you would be able to use a reason track like you can in pro tools, logic, ect.
DJ Premier wrote:...A lot of new cats out now do not know the history.

coolderb wrote:JAH wrote:jpeg wrote:in waht respect is maschine software behind reason 6
Really? I can think of numerous ways. They only advantages Maschine has over Reason is its dedicated integrated controller and support for 3rd party VST effects. Reason is a beast. I wish Akai adds some way to integrate Reason with the MPC Ren.
This has been done with Maschine. Check it out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hm_8nozru8g
coolderb wrote:remember when the beat thang was announced the specs of that ****?? it blew everything away...
coolderb wrote:remember when the beat thang was announced the specs of that ****?? it blew everything away...

coolderb wrote:The looks may not appeal to everyone,but I could care less what it looks like. The functionality, ease of use, work flow and yes the "fun" factor are what I look for. Not to mention active support from the developer in terms of updates. I do find it a bit ironic that an entire cottage industry has been created for folks who want to add more "bling" to their generic/bland drum machine/samplers. Lol
JAH wrote:coolderb wrote:The looks may not appeal to everyone,but I could care less what it looks like. The functionality, ease of use, work flow and yes the "fun" factor are what I look for. Not to mention active support from the developer in terms of updates. I do find it a bit ironic that an entire cottage industry has been created for folks who want to add more "bling" to their generic/bland drum machine/samplers. Lol
Well...the looks is just one aspect. Silly name, being sold at Best Buy, not being readily available in Japan, a new upstart company with nothing else on their resume, long delayed release...unadvertised plugin shipped before hardware, no reviews, etc, etc. I will never in my life even consider buying a Beat Thang. I would buy an ASR-X, Roland Groovebox, Alesis Drum Maschine, etc before buying a Beat Thang.

JAH wrote:I joke about the Beat Thang but wish them nothing but the best. If they want to capture a portion of this market...they should listen to forum feedback. They should listen to what MPC, MV, and Maschine users like about their chosen products..starting with the hardware.



W. Steele wrote:while Akai is going hard on their software for the new MP controllers
