Coz wrote:mp3 wrote:Once I boiled it all down to "which machine enables me to make the best beat the fastest" then the JJ machines came out as the clear winners.
Making beats fast is totally not what I care about or have any aspirations towards to be honest.
Understood but that's not exactly what I was saying.
I believe that, while at the end I'm the one making the beat, and so the end result belongs to me irrespective of the machine i used to make it, the process is also important in that it influences the end result in a somewhat intangible way (like, I can tell the difference between the stuff I did on the ASR-X (and not just sound quality wise), even though that stuff still sounds like a beat
"I" would do...). So I'm not saying its all about speed (if that was the case then I would have said "enables me to make
"a" beat the fastest", or, more likely, I would be using a DAW...), but its a matter of
how workflow influences creativity. Its kind of hard to explain, but its just one of those things where, once I got JJ it was like aha!
Coz wrote:mp3 wrote:how can 128XL possibly be off-putting?
He's killing off a bunch of features that I like using and I haven't got the appetite to hang around waiting for them to be re-introduced. XL will obviously continue to be a great OS nevertheless. I just fancy a change.
But that's precisely my point. He's not killing off anything. I honestly don't see how JJ introducing 128XL and you ditching OS2XL are related... To me, its kinda like how people feel this urge to upgrade their computer and/or software all the time. Just because the new 'ish comes out, it doesn't stop the current one from being exactly what it was the day before.
If you want to change things up for unrelated reasons, then you should by all means go in homie... I've certainly been there before...
But anyway, we're going OT so my apologies to everyone who's getting annoyed with me
