Sample Record Mode

Sparq is trying to be reasonable Jah. I so believe the Ren does have alot of the
features that Jah was talking about. He could prove us wrong by stating otherwise.

But to clear some things up I believe I may be wrong that Jah just wanted to keep
the forum active with interest on the products. However I myself was thinking whether he was stating a future functions or the current state of the Ren cuz I expected 90% of those functions to already be in the first os from the videos and Andy's comment unless I was mistaken for 8 months.

Since we got to wait to early Oct early Fall some tidbits on what's Jah unit can do or what's happening could suffice for now. Ask for some updates Jah since you are in constant contact with them. That goodwill would go a long way.

Taking your advice.....

Assume that the MPC Ren only has the Sample Record Mode functions found in the MPC 2000. What additional functioms would you like to see implemented?

"First response....the MPC 2000? The Ren is not worth $1300. You are a fool to spend money on this lame Nukai product."

Blue Haze, you have seen the product yourself. So what are your opinions?

Jah, how about ask akai for permission for creating youtube video of you doing a beat from scratch on Ren and going over features while doing so...This would give us more info on Ren and its features than this entire section of the forum combined..from there you could ask questions what we'd like to see implemented or improved on....right now we going off pure speculation and beatn around the bush

konc3pt wrote:Jah, how about ask akai for permission for creating youtube video of you doing a beat from scratch on Ren and going over features while doing so...This would give us more info on Ren and it's features than this entire section of the forum...from there you could ask questions what we'd like to see implemented or improved on....right now we going off pure speculation and beatn around the bush

Me? Not until this forum is policed like the JJ OS Forum and not letting obvious lies persist such as the Ren not using ASIO drivers.

If you're in direct contact with Dan why don't you ask him to pop back here to clear up the misunderstandings and give us an update?

Just think of all the threads you could start off the back of it...

JAH wrote:

konc3pt wrote:Jah, how about ask akai for permission for creating youtube video of you doing a beat from scratch on Ren and going over features while doing so...This would give us more info on Ren and it's features than this entire section of the forum...from there you could ask questions what we'd like to see implemented or improved on....right now we going off pure speculation and beatn around the bush

Me? Not until this forum is policed like the JJ OS Forum and not letting obvious lies persist such as the Ren not using ASIO drivers.

Who else got Ren and isnt afraid to discuss it ? What part of everything that has been discussed in this section, other than official akai info is pure speculation you dont grasp?. We just speculating about with info available to us. How about prove it otherwise, instead of using weak excuse of forum not being modernized enough and false accusations holding you back. You caused this havoc cuz nobody else baiting here but yourself. Cmmon son, emerging tsunami would have been much better excuse to get out of this one....

not letting obvious lies persist such as the Ren not using ASIO drivers.

You were asked to clear the confusion simply telling us that ASIO was supported instead you chose to play word games. Secondly, they were interested in thier stabilty compared to what Akai has already released with a bad track record. Again, you could have killed all speculation in one swipe. No other beta tester is playing the "look what I got" game. Once the Ren is
released, just like with any other product , who had it first carries no weight.

Coz wrote:If you're in direct contact with Dan why don't you ask him to pop back here to clear up the misunderstandings and give us an update?

Just think of all the threads you could start off the back of it...

Several influential forum members have the same contact......

The only reason I frequent this forum is to be a geek and discuss MPCs and hopefully contribute to the advancement of MPCs......I look forward to camraderie among MPC Ren users and those interested in the Ren. And to buy MPC Samples...

Some of you should ask yourselves why you visit these forums? What purpose does it serve you to write everyday about a product you hate instead of something you like?

konc3pt wrote:
Who else got Ren and isnt afraid to discuss it ? What part of everything that has been discussed in this section, other than official akai info is pure speculation you dont grasp?. We just speculating about with info available to us. How about prove it otherwise, instead of using weak excuse of forum not being modernized enough and false accusations holding you back. You caused this havoc cuz nobody else baiting here but yourself. Cmmon son, emerging tsunami would have been much better excuse to get out of this one....

Several forum members have the Ren or the software. Some discuss it in other forums. Ask yourself why they don't discuss it here.

You choose to write lies and pass it off as speculation as you haven't seen any new details. This misleads forum members; not a good look. Nothing is holding me back. I have been discussing topics near and dear to my heart. You focus on what I write instead of what interests you most. I wrote a thread about Sample Record Mode. You posted in this thread just to bait or annoy me. The havoc is caused my you but you are not alone.

Coz wrote:The Ren section (AKA jah's blog)...

JAH wrote:

DJ Hellfire wrote:You can do this in Maschine! All you have to do is set one pad to record the original source and insert the plugin on that pad, which will basically be used as an auxiliary and won't be doing any actual recording. Then output that pad to the input of another pad to actually sample the audio on. I personally don't like recording effects into the audio. But it can be done!

I believe you are the one that turned me onto this before. But that is equally annoying as resampling on the previously mentioned other products.

I guess! I mean, it only takes an extra 2 seconds to set up and can all be done without a mouse.

JAH wrote:

Coz wrote:If you're in direct contact with Dan why don't you ask him to pop back here to clear up the misunderstandings and give us an update?

Just think of all the threads you could start off the back of it...

Several influential forum members have the same contact......

The only reason I frequent this forum is to be a geek and discuss MPCs and hopefully contribute to the advancement of MPCs......I look forward to camraderie among MPC Ren users and those interested in the Ren. And to buy MPC Samples...

Some of you should ask yourselves why you visit these forums? What purpose does it serve you to write everyday about a product you hate instead of something you like?

how do you exactly see yourself contributing to advancement of MPCs, MPC5000 you clearly stated that most features you didnt care for, how buggy was the unit at it's initial release ?. Ren you wont make a video, or discuss info outside of what akai gave us already. Instead of working directly with akai you bait here on the forum prancing around saying how you know for a fact what's Ren has got and what it dont but wont go into detail after that. Then proceed to create threads asking about features, that some come off as basic functions, yet you claim for Ren to be a competitive piece of gear about which you get questioned and avoid direct answers. without giving any inside on Ren's current state. You sure aint shy from throwing accusations of false and untrue facts being thrown around. But you wont do anything to prove otherwise. In your view how is this process better any MPC and contribute to advancement ? We aint seen jack of Rens features advertised being put to use or if the features discussed are being implemented. You wont even show Ren at work. How is this benefit any of us on here other than pitching ideas for you to take to run back to akai with and take credit for. After all the input given up to this point you dont even got courtesy to show us how Ren behaves during simple beat making prcoess. again how do you see yourseld as a contributor to advancement and benefit of MPC's.

DJ Hellfire wrote:

Coz wrote:The Ren section (AKA jah's blog)...

These typically happens with each new MPC release.

The MPC 2500 forum was spammed to death by MPC 1000 users saying we paid double the price for what is essentially the same product. Then the MPC 4000s users spammed the MPC 5000 forum to remind us that the 4000 is still da Kang. lol The Ren is now getting it from all ends to include Maschine and MV users.

konc3pt wrote:how do you exactly see yourself contributing to advancement of MPCs...

You are joking right? I live and breath MPCs. Beta tested OS of several MPCs. Keep my ears to the streets (aka this forum) to channel up what forum members like and dislike about MPCs....this includes functions I don't need or care for as it is not about me although you make it out to be. You are uninformed about a beta tester's role......

JAH wrote:

Coz wrote:If you're in direct contact with Dan why don't you ask him to pop back here to clear up the misunderstandings and give us an update?

Just think of all the threads you could start off the back of it...

Several influential forum members have the same contact......

The only reason I frequent this forum is to be a geek and discuss MPCs and hopefully contribute to the advancement of MPCs......I look forward to camraderie among MPC Ren users and those interested in the Ren. And to buy MPC Samples...

Some of you should ask yourselves why you visit these forums? What purpose does it serve you to write everyday about a product you hate instead of something you like?

konc3pt wrote:
Who else got Ren and isnt afraid to discuss it ? What part of everything that has been discussed in this section, other than official akai info is pure speculation you dont grasp?. We just speculating about with info available to us. How about prove it otherwise, instead of using weak excuse of forum not being modernized enough and false accusations holding you back. You caused this havoc cuz nobody else baiting here but yourself. Cmmon son, emerging tsunami would have been much better excuse to get out of this one....

Several forum members have the Ren or the software. Some discuss it in other forums. Ask yourself why they don't discuss it here.

You choose to write lies and pass it off as speculation as you haven't seen any new details. This misleads forum members; not a good look. Nothing is holding me back. I have been discussing topics near and dear to my heart. You focus on what I write instead of what interests you most. I wrote a thread about Sample Record Mode. You posted in this thread just to bait or annoy me. The havoc is caused my you but you are not alone.

This is Ren section I dont see why I should be discussing or trying to track down other members discusssing Ren outside of here.

Just because I may say something untrue about ren dont make it a lie but uneducated guess. What steps do you take to correct these other than, pointing out the fact that you got Ren n I dont ? How is this informative and beneficial to anybody interested ? Im not misleading anybody, you misleading people saying how good Ren is then posting threads inquiring about opinions on basic functionality without stating current state of the project ? I'll take responsibility for creating tad of chaos around here. But that wouldnt be possible without your baiting tactics. You're right I am not alone

Several forum members have the Ren or the software.

To name a few - Xparis Dan , Andy, Jah, the dude that peddles samples (he's in different boards under different aliases) ......so yeah several.
OTOH none of them are spamming the forum , starting useless threads and posting validation pics.

konc3pt wrote:
This is Ren section I dont see why I should be discussing or trying to track down other members discusssing Ren outside of here.

Just because I may say something untrue about ren dont make it a lie but uneducated guess. What steps do you take to correct these other than, pointing out the fact that you got Ren n I dont ? How is this informative and beneficial to anybody interested ? Im not misleading anybody, you misleading people saying how good Ren is then posting threads inquiring about opinions on basic functionality without stating current state of the project ? I'll take responsibility for creating tad of chaos around here. But that wouldnt be possible without your baiting tactics. You're right I am not alone

You only have to track people down and do research if you want to be more knowledgable on a product. Not knowing anything about a product is no excuse for posting misleading information. How is my thread pointless when you created a thread simply to mislead people? My thread is a harmless feature request thread while yours simply spread lies and not beneficial to anyone outside of those that want to cause kaos and discourage anything positive about the Ren.

Creating a thread about features is not baiting.

moyphee wrote:

Several forum members have the Ren or the software.

To name a few

Your getting cold...colder....not even close. Not including me or any of the people you mentioned....you (moyphee) have personally spoken to at least 4 individuals that have knowledge of this product. People that you have communicated with several times over the years. Nuff said. My point is that there is a reason why they don't discuss what they know.....