Obi-Dan-Kenobi wrote:Toothflesh wrote:to me (detailed) critical comments are the best cause then I know what i'm doing wrong or not good enough.
i rather have peeps telling me my **** aint in key or the groove sucks then a meaningless "good beat" comment.
On the other side its hard to give feedback cause like Dan tuf's beat, hearing the intro makes me think "here's that damn Dan tuf again with a killer beat" but after the intro i immediately lost interest and I cant really say why and it's not my style to comment "beat aint interesting"
Theres definitely a weird psychology on beat battles full stop, what makes me laugh is a ton of comments and you don't get a vote ha ha! but then the comments are all Wow!! Yeah man!! etc totally misleading, totally agree with you on detailed critical comments done it with T.Jones and on it went. I'm all for it personally if my ****'s of I wanna know too!! 
I used to give critical comments but felt like I was dissing other beats while pretending mine was perfect. Kinda dumb psychology there and I guess giving more useful feedback is probably better.
In a perfect world the beats, comments and voting would all be anonymous and invisible until the vote was finished. Oh, and all the beats would be normalized so they had the same apparent volume.
But I hear you guys. Imma make an effort to be critical in my comments. It's better to try and improve on things (or at least realize what parts of a beat bug some people).