Bug reports & end-user support for Akai's MPC Software 'controllers' including the new MPC Studio 2, the MPC Touch, MPC Renaissance & original MPC Studio and MPC StudioB lack.
By Fess Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:43 pm
JAH wrote:
Fess wrote:
Increased sample limit per pad. Right now it's 4 I believe. Having the ability to stack more sounds on one pad would be useful.

There are two methods to accomplish that:
1. Simult pads. You can have up to 20 sounds trigger from striking 1 pad
2. Keygroup programs. You can create a 16 pad program with 32 sounds stacked on each pad. or 512 samples stacked on 1 pad


Edit - Sparq just wrote same thing with fuzzy math :P




Thanks for the info man. :)
User avatar
By JAH Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:10 am
japspecvr6 wrote:Jah-


Naming tracks/Seqs/Prgms the JJos Way.

I would like to see naming from the hardware as that is the way every other MPC performs. But how many people would actually use this when you can type names directly into the software?
By japspecvr6 Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:03 am
Nah....The only thing I should be touching the software for is super complex features that isn't implemented yet. The only beauty about the software is to have the power of the CPU to run it.

Need One-Shot on audition as well.
User avatar
By JAH Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:56 am
MIDIchlorian wrote:Without spilling the beans I just wanted to chime in and say you all have reason to be excited when 1.1 drops soon.
Today was a good day :nod:


japspecvr6 wrote:Nah....The only thing I should be touching the software for is super complex features that isn't implemented yet. The only beauty about the software is to have the power of the CPU to run it.

Need One-Shot on audition as well.


Naming from the hardware vs exciting new 1.1 feature? :hmmm:
By japspecvr6 Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:10 am
JAH wrote:
MIDIchlorian wrote:Without spilling the beans I just wanted to chime in and say you all have reason to be excited when 1.1 drops soon.
Today was a good day :nod:


japspecvr6 wrote:Nah....The only thing I should be touching the software for is super complex features that isn't implemented yet. The only beauty about the software is to have the power of the CPU to run it.

Need One-Shot on audition as well.


Naming from the hardware vs exciting new 1.1 feature? :hmmm:



Both are important to me.
User avatar
By JAH Sat Sep 29, 2012 3:32 am
japspecvr6 wrote:
JAH wrote:
MIDIchlorian wrote:Without spilling the beans I just wanted to chime in and say you all have reason to be excited when 1.1 drops soon.
Today was a good day :nod:


japspecvr6 wrote:Nah....The only thing I should be touching the software for is super complex features that isn't implemented yet. The only beauty about the software is to have the power of the CPU to run it.

Need One-Shot on audition as well.


Naming from the hardware vs exciting new 1.1 feature? :hmmm:



Both are important to me.

I feel you. But go look in the feature suggestion threads. There are actually hundreds of features forum members want in addition to correcting any bugs and increased stability.

My best guess is that functions/features that are not possible on the hardware and software will have a higher priority than a function already implemented that can be accomplished in one way or another.
By japspecvr6 Sat Sep 29, 2012 7:33 am
japspecvr6 wrote:Nah....The only thing I should be touching the software for is super complex features that isn't implemented yet. The only beauty about the software is to have the power of the CPU to run it.

Need One-Shot on audition as well.


Naming from the hardware vs exciting new 1.1 feature? :hmmm:[/quote][/quote]


I feel you as well, But like I said there's no reason why it shouldnt have the same functions as the Legacy models. Ive looked that thread up and down and some of the feature request were by people who really dont understand what MPC's are,With being said Im still waiting for 1.1
User avatar
By JAH Sat Sep 29, 2012 9:07 am
These threads are always entertaining....

What individuals 'expect' and what will be 'delivered' will obviously be different.