Nym wrote:it does not really work that way.
Well please enlighten us to why this is, if you could thanks.
torsig1967 thats pretty lame to ask about a feature being removed yet do not have a single feature to ADD?? wtf come on son. bad form IMO, other people use it.
Not me like, but people do.
Not that I agree with torsig1967. I mean I never use the looper myself but do see it being used by others, so understand it being there. But not pong. And that would be in the same vain as torsig1967, inso much as I see very valuable resources, which I might add, the lack of these is used as a reason all the time, to say things can not be improved. HUH?? What? No I don't believe it, sorry. make it more open please to all. Make it open to us the users, the supporters, the buyers, the people using it. get it ?
Hear me Nym pass that on yeah. . . .
Other wise I am gonna be one hella cranky old man till I get just a couple of small improvements that make it so much better as a stand alone sequencer/sampler. Please tell me what I have to do to convince you, muria and et al that there are solid reasons for some queries requests, and just getting flogged off with the same excuse does not help, when pong is still in there.
Where is the respect for me as a user? Respect goes both ways and all I do is support JJOS, so dont think reading this I do not like JJOS, and if you have not got JJOSXL, then get it, but still, Im not sure the resources are really used to there full potential if pong fits in it. I know its small, but still