Sounds good in theory, shouldn't be too hard to prove if true.
Seems like a good reason to go with the original, 'if' the bass response is better, and 'if' there is less noise.
You can't really argue about the heat, if you have used both, it is there, it really depends on the buyer to decide if that matters, it is just personal opinion. To me, it makes sense that the additional heat inside the older version is going to put more stress on the internal components than the cooler power supply in the later version, and those components are going to be older and possibly had more usage over it's lifetime.
There doesn't seem to be much proof of anything in those quotes from the book, a preference and an opinion offered as a fact, not really a technical fact, more that it is true that people believe these things, that doesn't necessarily make them correct.
The bass and noise theories sound interesting, and could be tested by putting a scope on the output of each power supply to confirm that there is actually a less constant voltage, with more noise, getting to the SP circuitry, along with side by side listening tests and audio analysis of exactly the same beats and tones playing out of both versions, to show that this possible less constant voltage and more noise into the circuitry actually results in a sound quality difference that you can hear between the same version.
If you were OCD enough, you could possibly even swap power supplies between the two versions, and see if any noise differences/problems follow the power supplies.
The SP book, after all, is just written by people like us on a forum, based on what they and other forum members/external parties believe, possibly without any real verifiable proof...to me, it doesn't make it fact.
I have seen it said on the SP forums, for example, that the same beats sound the same out of both versions.
I would still like to see/hear some side by side tests, through a high quality signal chain, and into some high quality convertors. There is no reason this can't be done, if someone can be bothered.
If that was done in a couple of different locations, with different sets of machines, to ensure there is not a problem with one of the SPs that causes a particular issue, then I would believe.
Clint wrote:The book is proving to be a good read so far, but there is some 'filler' as I was warned..and get this, it was written by an aussie named Simon.
Haha...WTF!
So what do you think Clint, are you up to the task of creating a book that can match, or better, the SP book in terms of quality of content and presentation?