SimonInAustralia wrote:Not sure I understand the 4-track cassette hype going on here, beyond being a product with similar design to the MPC60.
Don't think I would get too excited about using a Tascam 4-track cassette recorder in productions, is this really any different in terms of sound quality and features?
Is this really useful in today's recording processes?
SimonInAustralia makes a good point regarding the use of these old machines.
My angle however, is that its less about the ‘sound quality’ than the character these machines provide. – If we were concerned about fidelity, everyone on this forum would be using 24-bit samplers, rather than sp1200s, MPC60s/ 3000s.
Not convinced? – Consider that all the tracks on ‘36 Chambers’ were bounced down to a 4-track Tascam 244 with Type IV tape! “Character goes a long way”.
So Clint, I use the MG614 as my main mixer. I tend to embrace the character and limitations of the machine. When sampling through the MG into my mpc3000, theres a sweet spot just before it starts distorting. Personally, I ignore the visual cues (such as the VU hitting red), and rely on my ears. I see this as an advantage of analogue mixers – there’s a no-man’s-land between the point the signal starts distorting, but before its excessive. It’s kind of similar in this sense to sampling hot into the s950 (although obviously the 950 is digital).
The MG has some tasty parametric EQs, so I often EQ my samples through the MG when sampling into the MPC.
Final tip: you can get some nice texture/ atmosphere/ presence from having the DBX on during recording, but leave it off during playback. I’m not sure why this is the case! – I think the DBX was designed to eliminate tape hiss, but it also spills over to create some nice compression on certain harmonic ranges. (Obviously have the tape speed on high!)
I hope this helps Clint.