Share your knowledge on these two classic MPCs
By TZ Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:49 pm
There was a similar thread some time ago, but people started recommending MPC4000, then someone asked a technical question and the thread kind of died....

Let's say we're comparing fully upgraded (ram, os and scsi) MPC60/S3000 and MPC3000/S950 ...... which set-up do you think would be better and why?
User avatar

By erkl Sat Nov 27, 2004 1:46 am
all preferance, but mine would be the 3k/s950 (thats my setup) and i dont have to mess with sequencing the s950 cuz i just resample my drums through that, then save everything in the 3k and sequence it all internally (nice and quick i might add), and am able to save it all to 1 pgm/disk.

By TZ Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:05 pm
Wouldn't resampling the drums from S950 into the 3000 defeat the whole purpose of having a 12-bit sampler?

By roley101 Sat Nov 27, 2004 9:53 pm
Who gives a shit. Just do music. Nobody can tell the difference between bits. But for me personally, i cant use s series samplers. They're the defintion of user unfriendly, not to mention outdated. And the 3000 is way more flexible than the 60 with no noticeable loss of "grit" the 60 is a dinosuar with none of the benefits of a SP1200.

By TZ Sun Nov 28, 2004 9:29 pm
Anybody else wants to give me his opinion on my original question?

By fobedafied Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:41 pm
id go mpc3000 and s950 if given the choice...
User avatar

By Something Like That Mon Nov 29, 2004 1:13 am
I use the 3k combined with my S950. It's great and you will love it. You can pick up a S950 for pretty cheap but 3k's are gonna run you.
User avatar

By DOVESKI Mon Nov 29, 2004 2:35 am
3K, no need for a 950.

By fobedafied Mon Nov 29, 2004 6:00 am
i say 950s are nice no matter what else you got...

By TZ Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:23 pm
Seems like everyone would prefer MPC3000/S950 so far.

DOVESKI wrote:3K, no need for a 950.

I thought it would be nice to have both 12-bit and a 16-bit sampler....

By zaster Wed Dec 01, 2004 6:02 pm
If you dont like s950 u might try a yamaha tx 16 w.
12 bit also, sounds cool to me and you can get them mad cheap.
I paid about 60 Euros for mine. It is equippped with 1,5 MB stock which
should be enough for drums I think. Just make sure you wont use the standart Yamaha OS. Just download Typhoon 2000 for free and be done.
User avatar

By DOVESKI Wed Dec 01, 2004 6:44 pm
TZ wrote:
DOVESKI wrote:3K, no need for a 950.

I thought it would be nice to have both 12-bit and a 16-bit sampler....


Shit my man I'll post up some drums sequences from the 3K, sampled with no compressors, no nothing, straight from vinyl through a little vestax to the 3K, and it will kill any idea you might have that a 12 bit sampler is nice to have or will make your drums thump harder. 3K is the truth on drums.

here a loop all 3K, sounds 12 bit as fuk though.

http://fileserv6.soundclick.com/fastk9/ ... umloop.mp3

By TZ Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:36 am
Thanks for the link man....

I wasn't necessarily thinking 12-bit would be "better" for drums. I was just wondering if having both 12 and 16 bit samplers would be beneficial.

Peace

By theliveguywithglasses Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:57 pm
The good thing about the 950 is the filters, it's worth getting one just for that. I don't know about the 3000 but the 2000XL filters are garbage compared to the S950 and S1000.