For discussion about setting up your studio and advice on the gear and equipment within it.

Better build quality... Akai Japan or Numark era Akai?

41
95%
2
5%
User avatar
By Coz Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:58 am
This barely even warrants its own thread, but trying to have a rational discussion about it in the Ren forum is a pointless waste of time.

If anyone wants to chime in on what it has taken to keep their MPC going strong, or tales of woe, feel free to add to the thread. This is not a thread about comparing software features, or how X model cost 3 grand 25 years ago and Y model costs 700 quid today!


Either way, I wanted to reply to Hellfire properly without any 'distractions'. :wink:



DJ Hellfire wrote:
Coz wrote:Nukai have never been particularly great at making hardware anyway, so it's no loss that they are now in the software/controller business.



Not sure why people feel this way. "Real" Akai MPC's have problems just as much. I have an XL, which I got brand new. I've had issues with stiff buttons that have to be pressed hard as **** to work. The play button broke. The note variation slider potentiometer is **** up and jumps all over the place. And now the screen is all **** up with a bunch of dead pixels. It's even crashed and froze a few times. And I never abused it or dropped it or smoked around it. With the exception of the bad screen, all of these issues occured within the same time frame of ownership as how long I've had my 2500. So far, only issue I had with my 2500 (bought in 2008 brand new) is the pads issue, and the black coating mysteriously rubbing off the case. I honestly wouldn't say Nukai MPC's are that much worse than "Real" MPC's, going from my personal experience.



A common problem with older MPCs (from what I've read - not personal experience) is the technology that went into the screens. So the 60 and 3k required the replacement of backlight foils, with the occasional more expensive component biting the dust. Hopefully someone can add to this because I've never been lucky enough to own one of those machines. Some people moan about the transport buttons being a weak point, but then you see them HAMMERING them in youtube vids so it's no surprise they break! :lol:

The XL seems to be the hardest MPC to maintain when it comes to the screen. There's no easy fixes and no spares knocking around other than from 'donor' machines. From forum chatter I've picked up over the years, there's been a few people who have suggested that some of the machine's processing power actually comes from the screen itself? I don't know if that is true, but irrespective of that, when I sold mine after nearly a decade of ownership the Play/Start button had worked its way loose, but everything else worked perfectly.

When I got my 2500 it was as good as brand new. There wasn't even a spec of dust on it. Within 18 months the coating was rubbing off the front, the tact switches were dying for fun and the pads were getting irregular in their response. The Jog wheel is also 100% part and parcel of the overall build quality of any machine, and the one on the 2500 is a total bona fide piece of shit! A huge comedown from the XL jog. If you work through the night on beats when the house is near silent (like I do), the 2500 jog is the equivalent of finger nails scraping on a chalk board. It's cheap and nasty.

I sold that and got the 4K. Night and day in feel and build. Obviously any piece of hardware can break and have shit go wrong, but the 4K feels like it's built to last. I'm guessing mine is around 8 years old at this point. I've got a spare screen for when this one inevitably goes up in smoke. :mrgreen:

What can you say about the 1K? Well, for starters it barely even needs mentioning that the first batch was released with a faulty pad design that users had to foot the bill for to put right. By the time you factor in the 'new' pad design plus fat pads to get decent sensitivity, you're talking a lot of money for a supposedly 'cheap' MPC. Obviously they sorted out the issue with the black models, and it also goes without saying that having the ability to fix whatever machine you own will always be a bonus, but that's secondary to what I'm saying. IMO the quality control, general build quality and innovation took a dip in the Nukai era.

The jury is still out on the Ren. Prominent members such as yourself, IMMB and Es-k have all had to get replacement units within the first 12 months, amongst at least another 10 forum members that I can recall. Time will tell how well it stands up in the future...
By JVC Fri Sep 13, 2013 6:17 pm
As far as I know, MPC60 series, MPC3000 are the only MPCs that were manufactured on Japan. MPC2000 series, MPC4000, MPC2500, MPC1000 were made in China. (correct me if I'm wrong.) MPC5000 were not designed by Akai Japan (which had completely vanished), but presumably Alesis's engineer team (my guess, I could be wrong.)

In regard to built quality, it is not only Akai's fault, but somewhere around early 90s', consumer electronics' built quality standard was lowered somehow. I may be biased, but I like 80s' and 90s' electronics made in Japan, because I feel that they are well built and designs are almost always well thought out.

If you ask me, MPC-2000 classic and MPC-2000XL were manufactured in a kind of sloppy fashion. I'm taking about how boards are mounted, quality of soldering job, quality of finish of metal case, etc. MPC2000s are metal cased and all, so they are kind of tough, but I see some rough edges here and there.

Fortunately MPC2000XL is easy machine to repair if you have basic soldering skills (with an exception of the LCD screen, of course), as tact switches and rotary encoder are common parts.
By soundtech Fri Sep 13, 2013 6:49 pm
Mpc 60 and mpc 3000 built like tanks, very solid

Its just a good feeling to have machine like that

Cant speak for a 4000 but looks solid

Had a 2500, i enjoyed the machine and was in good condition also the build was alright really if you ask me. Not a 60 or a 3000 but alright. Bit plastiky


I guess youd expect that of an mpc nowadays but they can certainly do better on the build. Havent had a ren i like other mps better :) but the build doesnt look solid. Defo not a machine to go for many years


So akai japan all day here
User avatar
By mr_debauch Fri Sep 13, 2013 10:28 pm
wasn't there a thing on here about the 2000 classic having some early run models made in japan as well? I don't know, but mine is china... and it is built well. yes the screen is a bad design, however mine is still brand new minty fresh. the shittiest thing on my 2000 is the fat pads which threw all sensitivity out the window.....

now, rolling back to my 60ii, it is built well... it is plastic (or maybe some sort of fiberglass type shit.. who knows) so it wouldn't take a direct impact like a 2000 or an og 60 would. That said, every button is brand new except a bit of fade on my stop button and playstart on the lettering.


now looking at the newer models, meh... sometimes it's the little things... be **** careful putting in the ram expansion, those clips will break right the **** off if you aren't careful. The 500 pads are TRASH... they are. one dude here took his pads out and cut out the grid between the pad holes so he could touch the sensors directly... it might have been that pedophile dude who did that.. I can't remember. it may be design related, but having every pad and button play a double or triple role with the use of shift and alt type buttons is bad too.... the 60 had a button for every feature except some menu stuff which had you pushing numbers. maybe that helped those tacts last longer.


the price of the 60 may have been between 3 and 5 grand back in 1988... but that is because computer components were **** expensive. the ram expansion (750 kilobytes) alone costed like 600-800 dollars apparently. all computer stuff was like that at the time... you had 200-300 commodore 64 machines but they had like 64 kilobytes of ram or some small amount like that... and here we are talking about a custom computer with 750kb of ram stock? yes, it will be expensive.. same with every other component in the box, the AD and DA converters... all that shit was cutting edge tech at the time in one small package. When the 2500 dropped, it was already old tech... remember when the 5000 dropped? the new tech there was the proprietary ram slot so you couldn't buy your 128 meg chip of laptop ram at a store for 10 bucks. Anyhow, the high price wasn't related to built quality on the japanese mpc models.
By JVC Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:57 pm
MPC-2000 classic that I owned was made in China. Yes, I thought it was built well, but I didn't think it was assembled well, compared to Made in Japan MPCs (or other Akai product that time, such as tape recorders)

I forgot about MPC-500. I think MPC-500 was developed by Numark / Alesis. Considering the built quality, MPC-500 was pretty expensive model.

By the way, I think MPC-2500 used to come with metal casing (panel). It was developed by Akai Japan (that's why there is JJOS for 2500 and 1000), but it is quite possible after Numark / Alesis took over the Akai Pro, they might have revised components.

MPC-4000 was last MPC that Akai Japan released. As far as specification is concerned, it was pretty technologically ahead of time. The jog dial used on 4000 is optical type, which means that it should last longer than other MPCs rotary encoder. I can see that they were trying to create updated MPC-3000. I haven't seen 4000 in person, so I cannot really comment on the built quality, but so far I've been hearing that the built quality is good, but I've also heard that some of batches are troublesome.
User avatar
By Ill-Green Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:27 am
The 500 was made in Malaysia and its in a metal casing as well. It looks plastic on gear catalogs, Pics don't do it justice neither. I hate the plastic buttons and knobs though.

Is the cursor button really that ugly on all MPCs? They all look the same to me.
User avatar
By mr_debauch Tue Sep 17, 2013 4:39 am
Ill-Green wrote:The 500 was made in Malaysia and its in a metal casing as well. It looks plastic on gear catalogs, Pics don't do it justice neither. I hate the plastic buttons and knobs though.

Is the cursor button really that ugly on all MPCs? They all look the same to me.


yeah the case seems kind of rugged I admit... but on my friend's 500 I found the buttons give that feeling of needing to be careful and dont push to hard on them when you get into that non shalonte zone while beat making...

my main gripe actually was the pads though which sort of distracts from other perceptions of the machine (in my experience)..


I would use one if I had it... and I could look past those issues because of the portability.
User avatar
By Ill-Green Tue Sep 17, 2013 5:24 am
mr_debauch wrote:
Ill-Green wrote:The 500 was made in Malaysia and its in a metal casing as well. It looks plastic on gear catalogs, Pics don't do it justice neither. I hate the plastic buttons and knobs though.

Is the cursor button really that ugly on all MPCs? They all look the same to me.


yeah the case seems kind of rugged I admit... but on my friend's 500 I found the buttons give that feeling of needing to be careful and dont push to hard on them when you get into that non shalonte zone while beat making...

my main gripe actually was the pads though which sort of distracts from other perceptions of the machine (in my experience)..


I would use one if I had it... and I could look past those issues because of the portability.


Yeah the pad response is terrible out the factory. Fat pads will cure that and make it piano-like or corx under the stock pads even three pieces of tape but they must be cut exact to the squares under the rubber.

And the engineering of the buttons is like not trying to crack an egg. I used a skin over mine and shifted it just enough so the skin can pillow the buttons.
By JVC Tue Sep 17, 2013 3:20 pm
Ill-Green wrote:The 500 was made in Malaysia and its in a metal casing as well. It looks plastic on gear catalogs, Pics don't do it justice neither. I hate the plastic buttons and knobs though.


I didn't know that MPC-500 was metal cased. I always thought that it was all in plastic (not that metal casing is always better than plastic casing.) I've seen it in person, but it was in a display case, so I've never touched it.

Ill-Green wrote:Is the cursor button really that ugly on all MPCs? They all look the same to me.


I agree, the cursor buttons on MPCs (MPC-2000, 1000, 2500) look OK to me.
User avatar
By Coz Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:08 pm
acronym wrote:That 1 vote must be Jahrome :lol:



It might be Hellfire. :mrgreen:

All latecomers to the beta testing fold have to swear allegiance to jah and throw a few darts at a photo of Roger Linn. :lol: