Bug reports & end-user support for Akai's MPC Software 'controllers' including the new MPC Studio 2, the MPC Touch, MPC Renaissance & original MPC Studio and MPC StudioB lack.
User avatar
By DJ Hellfire Thu Oct 17, 2013 12:59 am
master-ceo wrote:
DJ Hellfire wrote:
master-ceo wrote:
The only thing I don't like about the program mixer is that you cant use the pads to select the sound you want to adjust.



You don't really need to though, since each pad is automatically assigned to a q link for adjustment. Unless I'm missing what you're talking about!



True. I missed that one. With the studio it's a task but I guess I'll have to deal with it.



I always forget that the studio has half a q link! :lol:
User avatar
By DJ Hellfire Thu Oct 17, 2013 1:00 am
JAH wrote:
DJ Hellfire wrote:
JAH wrote:I record all my drums on a single track and use the Program Mixer.



If I wasn't forced to the submixer when adding plugins to pads and could export pads as stems, I would also go this route! I like seeing all of my drums on the same piano roll, but the limitations of the mixer keeps me from using this how I would like to.

Going old skool....

1. Set the Output of ALL Pads to 1/2 (as opposed to Track or Submix)
2. Then I mix like I was using a hardware MPC and ignore the Track Mixer



What advantage do you get going directly out of 1/2 as opposed to the submix? For me, the bypassing of the track mixer is my gripe!
User avatar
By JAH Thu Oct 17, 2013 2:09 am
DJ Hellfire wrote:What advantage do you get going directly out of 1/2 as opposed to the submix? For me, the bypassing of the track mixer is my gripe!


It takes the Track Mixer out of the equation and you will be using the MPC Software like a traditional MPC. You would then mix using the Program and Plugin Mixer. I know it sounds like something you don't want.

But...trying recording a few sequences, mix as you compose..all while ignoring the Track mixer. You will still have inserts and send FXs, automation, etc.

The advantage is.....the same mixer settings across all your sequences.
User avatar
By DJ Hellfire Thu Oct 17, 2013 1:00 pm
JAH wrote:
DJ Hellfire wrote:What advantage do you get going directly out of 1/2 as opposed to the submix? For me, the bypassing of the track mixer is my gripe!


It takes the Track Mixer out of the equation and you will be using the MPC Software like a traditional MPC. You would then mix using the Program and Plugin Mixer. I know it sounds like something you don't want.

But...trying recording a few sequences, mix as you compose..all while ignoring the Track mixer. You will still have inserts and send FXs, automation, etc.

The advantage is.....the same mixer settings across all your sequences.



Yeah, I gave that a try in the beginning! It just get's overwhelming with all the additional pad banks the Ren has now. :lol: But it'd be nice if the program mixer were able to be set to only show pads with assigned samples.
By elogical4now Thu Oct 17, 2013 4:58 pm
DaizM wrote:single track for me to get it down fast and I like playing it together and then I break them out separately later...


Ren needs an "Explode or Divide Drum Type" function. So after recording all parts on one track, they can be easily sent to separate tracks.

Most often though, I record each part to its own track..just makes it easier for bouncing into daw.