Naming CHOPS.

At this time the automatic CHOP naming is illogigal and sample browser shows new samples non alphabetical.

This is how it looks now

Sample 001 Sl1
Sample 001 Sl10
Sample 001 Sl11
Sample 001 Sl12
Sample 001 Sl13
Sample 001 Sl14
Sample 001 Sl15
Sample 001 Sl16
Sample 001 Sl2
Sample 001 Sl3
Sample 001 Sl4
Sample 001 Sl5
Sample 001 Sl6
Sample 001 Sl7
Sample 001 Sl8
Sample 001 Sl9

This is how it should look

Sample 001 001
Sample 001 002
Sample 001 003
Sample 001 004
Sample 001 005
Sample 001 006
Sample 001 007
Sample 001 008
Sample 001 009
Sample 001 010
Sample 001 011
Sample 001 012
Sample 001 013
Sample 001 014
Sample 001 015
Sample 001 016


Or like this


Sample 001 Sl 001
Sample 001 Sl 002
Sample 001 Sl 003
Sample 001 Sl 004
Sample 001 Sl 005
Sample 001 Sl 006
Sample 001 Sl 007
Sample 001 Sl 008
Sample 001 Sl 009
Sample 001 Sl 010
Sample 001 Sl 011
Sample 001 Sl 012
Sample 001 Sl 013
Sample 001 Sl 014
Sample 001 Sl 015
Sample 001 Sl 016

I rename my chopped samples almost every time because of better ordering in sample browser. Characters between letters doesen't bug me.
This way samples would be ordered automatically in alphabetical order and browsing becomes much faster and easier.

So its OK to make new program every time i chop samples?

This could be done so easily without using another program for naming.

Also no NDC and its almost 2014?? I know that has been requested from beginning.