Anyone know how to adjust the qlinks for trimming?

I use the qlinks like an asr 10 to scour and adjust start and end points on samples while trimming. Howevever, is there a way which I can adjust the sensitivity so its not so coarse?

Which MPC? Which JJ OS?
Don't expect much precision with the 1K faders
Zoom IN/OUT can help by the way.

JJOSXL

I was zooming in still but the qlinks are still pretty coarse. Guess the answer is no

yeah, that cracks me up also. It would be nice if it would go with zoom hand in hand..

Yeah, the qlink based trimming is only good for broad strokes. The scrollwheel is usually required for fine tuning IME

I know just like how my asr 10 chops, so would be nice if I could emulate it on xl.

Yeah indeed ZOOM doesn't help sorry.

I loaded a 2/3 minutes sample in os2xl, put zoom in at max and moved the slider as slow as possible. The first increment value with the Q link was 50 000, really too much. I think it should be coherent with the zoom level at least.

I don't know how the ASR works but if i'm not mistaken the q link feature in TRIM is not implemented in OS3 yet. It could be worth to do a request if you really want to see something improved.

Peace

I was told that it is difficult to make the q link adjustment efficient with different zoom in/out settings. Even if it was possible it wouldn't be for OS2XL due to a lack of space for new parameters. Same story

Lampdog wrote:ASR10 has coarse and then fine, that's it.

Thats how the SP was.
Two sliders each for the front and back.

Editing was lightening fast by moving the two rough and fine sliders while holding down the repeat trigger. One slider running from the begging to the end and then boom, grab the second one and zero in like a guided missile.

You could find any point in a sample and zero in to the closest increment in less then 10 seconds.
It would be nice if the dual 1000 sliders could do the same.

le rat wrote:I was told that it is difficult to make the q link adjustment efficient with different zoom in/out settings. Even if it was possible it wouldn't be for OS2XL due to a lack of space for new parameters. Same story

All the more reason to get excited about the possibilities and potential of OS3, even if its not quite ready for workaday prime-time yet.

Yeah if you show JJ how it works in the ASR or the SP, I'm sure he will be able to find a good compromise for OS128XL or OS3

Otherwise I'll add this to the JJOS(2)XL limitation topic.

ThobRom wrote:

Lampdog wrote:ASR10 has coarse and then fine, that's it.

Thats how the SP was.
Two sliders each for the front and back.

Editing was lightening fast by moving the two rough and fine sliders while holding down the repeat trigger. One slider running from the begging to the end and then boom, grab the second one and zero in like a guided missile.

You could find any point in a sample and zero in to the closest increment in less then 10 seconds.
It would be nice if the dual 1000 sliders could do the same.

le rat wrote:I was told that it is difficult to make the q link adjustment efficient with different zoom in/out settings. Even if it was possible it wouldn't be for OS2XL due to a lack of space for new parameters. Same story

All the more reason to get excited about the possibilities and potential of OS3, even if its not quite ready for workaday prime-time yet.

You mean sp 404?