Question on OS3 - Is it possible to cut sound by pressing pa

Is there a way to temporarily stop a sample from playing by merely pressing a pad? I want to mimic the transformer scratch effect (AUDIO on/off) with the pressing of a pad instead of a fader. Haven't figured out how to yet, seems as though it's not possible, wondering if I should put in a request for this feature? Any feedback would be great.

Go to Track Mute press Window and set in line first: Immediate, and second line: Note on
(this setting uses voices even if sounds are muted)

Thanks for the input. What you suggested still isn't quite what I'm looking for, if I understand you. I think you're suggesting using recordable track mutes to achieve the transformer effect, with Mute type set to Note On and Mute Stop set to Immediate. For me, I was only able to achieve that by setting Mute Type to Level (and assigned pad set to One Shot). Still, with this, I have to press the muted track twice, and it would take a bit of editing to get what i want, if at all.

I was initially looking into the Pad Pressure feature, and LFO level (with SEQ as target) almost does what I want, but there's still a ramping, gradual effect to the sound returning. Worded in terms of a Pad Pressure option, what I would be looking for would be LEVEL +/- (not LFO) D (duration): On/Off, with target >TRACK, or ALL (like with the Q-links). So by holding down a pad set to this, playback on other pads in the program would be interrupted for however long pressing continued.

I'm unsure how to put in a feature request, or if this would be possible code-wise, or cpu-wise, so any help would be great. Or if there's a workaround, fine.

You can try with q-link to level or from other controller just "ride on the fader"
I'm not sure does OS3 still got it. Otherwise there is no other option for transformer effect on one long sample.

Thanks again for the reply. Judging by what has already been added to the JJOS, my feeling is that what I would like to see implemented (spec'ed in my last post) is possible. So...based on your experience, should I put in a feature request? And if so, what's the recommended protocol for doing so?

I don't think there is any need for a request if you have two methods, that your not got quite right, already.

LFO first. Have you set the wave to square? I ask this as you mention it ramping and not cutting. Sounds like you are not using a square wave LFO and using sine/saw/triangle instead. Square LFO does it with out the ramping.

Second I would say that you do not like hitting pad twice means that they should change the OS. its takes two moves of the hand to do a proper transform to, so

You are right about the mute setting they suggested the other one but the one you got works, cept the whole omg i have have to hit the pad again. I am forever trying to tell people about patterns, and am sure mute info works, so make a mute transform pattern then it will be ONE pad press. I wil give it a go today, as I need to finish beat battle today and will try it. Simply make a blank track with mute info only, then make it a pattern, then assign to a pad then transform away by hitting paf once. sorted if it works. and it will always match tempo to and that kinda helps.