Bug reports & end-user support for Akai's MPC Software 'controllers' including the new MPC Studio 2, the MPC Touch, MPC Renaissance & original MPC Studio and MPC StudioB lack.
By TT_Lab Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:21 am
As Lampdog was asking:

1.7 NAMM PREVIEW S4S:



AKAI OFFICIAL VIDEOS:






OTHER VIDEOS:

Hellfire full Review:




1.7 & 1.6 co-install:




Expansion hack:

User avatar
By Coz Mon Sep 08, 2014 4:34 pm
Hellfire's video is really well put together. YouTube is throwing a wobbler for me on my Mac at the minute so I watched it on my phone instead.

Good stuff. 8)
User avatar
By DJ Hellfire Wed Sep 10, 2014 4:57 am
DJ Hellfire wrote:
Almost Lazy wrote:question for the testers...

whats the go with a program creating a series of programs for each track it might be used on..? this surely seems a messy list on the project folder...? (ie S1-T4)
is there a way of not allowing this to occur?
thanks in advance!



This is only when loading pre-1.7 projects because track inserts no longer exist. This was necessary to keep all of your sequences sounding the exact same as they were created in 1.6. Being that each sequence in 1.6 had un-unified track inserts, 1.7 needs to create a new program channel for each track in each sequence that had an insert in 1.6 for those track inserts to be moved to. New programs are only created for tracks that actually had insert effects on them in 1.6. This was the only way to do it because of the possibility that users may have used different plugin settings or different plugins altogether on the same track in different sequences in 1.6.

Once your project loads in 1.7, you can go through each sequence and assign all the same tracks to the same programs that have the same effects you want on those tracks and delete the extras that you don't need. Or you can utilise the filter to only show used programs for the current sequence which will clean up the "messy" look in the mixer.

I will have a video soon explaining this in more detail soon.





User avatar
By fdodds Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:15 am
One minor question Hellfire, you keep referring to the track mixer as editing the 'velocity' of hits, but from some tests I've run that doesn't seem to be the case. Can you verify this?

I created a hi-hat track at full level on a pad set up with velocity modifying the pitch. When you lower the volume on the track mixer the pitch stays the same, velocity is not altered, the track is just a separate per-track gain stage that goes into effect before the audio gets routed to the program mixer.

When I route drum pads from a program into Reaper it completely bypasses the program mixer, but the track mixer still effects the volume of the audio being routed across all pads... It may be that the track mixer just lowers the sample volume for all pads?

In any case I'm glad it doesn't actually change velocity, as that would change the sound of drum kits using any velocity mapping or layered samples with different velocity ranges.

*also how did you move between sequences without leaving track mix with the hardware? I always use that drop down menu up the top which is a pain..
User avatar
By DJ Hellfire Fri Sep 12, 2014 3:46 am
fdodds wrote:One minor question Hellfire, you keep referring to the track mixer as editing the 'velocity' of hits, but from some tests I've run that doesn't seem to be the case. Can you verify this?

I created a hi-hat track at full level on a pad set up with velocity modifying the pitch. When you lower the volume on the track mixer the pitch stays the same, velocity is not altered, the track is just a separate per-track gain stage that goes into effect before the audio gets routed to the program mixer.

When I route drum pads from a program into Reaper it completely bypasses the program mixer, but the track mixer still effects the volume of the audio being routed across all pads... It may be that the track mixer just lowers the sample volume for all pads?

In any case I'm glad it doesn't actually change velocity, as that would change the sound of drum kits using any velocity mapping or layered samples with different velocity ranges.

*also how did you move between sequences without leaving track mix with the hardware? I always use that drop down menu up the top which is a pain..



It doesn't alter the actual velocity of the recorded note. It does it as a modifier to the audio voices that track is sending to. It's like if you went into the list editor and did a tweak on the modifier column for Level of one of the notes, it wouldn't actually alter the note level data itself, just modifies the voice. This is pretty much what the track fader does now. I refer to it as velocity because what you are seeing on the track meters is the velocity of the note as it's hit. But it's reading the true note velocity as it is recorded, not the actual modified level.
User avatar
By fdodds Fri Sep 12, 2014 3:51 am
Cool, gotcha. I can see why referring to it as just velocity is simpler. Now give up the ghost on the sequence switching trick and I'll forget all about the ninja-edit you pulled :P