By renegadebliss
Mon Jun 16, 2014 7:50 am
Hey Lamp, much respect!!
Haven't posted her for like for ever !
But are you sure the bottleneck on the MPC is the IDE? I have plenty of Windows laptops running IDE drives and they are lighting fast compared to the MPC in regards to load speeds.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=20285
I used to think that the bottleneck was the Intel Strong Arm processor
As implied in this posting that I made from a response from Akai to me for a RFE (Request for Enhancement) to the AKai for the MPC 4000 to load samples while the sequencer is playing as the Z4/Z8 could...
But I also seem to remember a post on here from one of the developers (maybe the late and great Stephen Howell from Hollow Sun ... R.I.P.) can't remember who it was posted here on this forum (so somebody with good search skills might be able to find it), that the MPC 4000 and I think the Z4/Z8 has such long load times, because it has some algorithm that checks the integrity of the sample to ensure it's not corrupted.
I can't seem to find that post though. Maybe it was a personal email.
I've seen other people indicate the 2500 and 1000 via HD is quicker then the 4000. But I don't have either to compare. Maybe they dropped the "check" algorithm on those models?
Haven't posted her for like for ever !
But are you sure the bottleneck on the MPC is the IDE? I have plenty of Windows laptops running IDE drives and they are lighting fast compared to the MPC in regards to load speeds.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=20285
I used to think that the bottleneck was the Intel Strong Arm processor
As implied in this posting that I made from a response from Akai to me for a RFE (Request for Enhancement) to the AKai for the MPC 4000 to load samples while the sequencer is playing as the Z4/Z8 could...
But I also seem to remember a post on here from one of the developers (maybe the late and great Stephen Howell from Hollow Sun ... R.I.P.) can't remember who it was posted here on this forum (so somebody with good search skills might be able to find it), that the MPC 4000 and I think the Z4/Z8 has such long load times, because it has some algorithm that checks the integrity of the sample to ensure it's not corrupted.
I can't seem to find that post though. Maybe it was a personal email.
I've seen other people indicate the 2500 and 1000 via HD is quicker then the 4000. But I don't have either to compare. Maybe they dropped the "check" algorithm on those models?
Exploring the Inner Dimensions of Music
http://www.renegaderhythms.com
http://www.renegaderhythms.com



