Bug reports & end-user support for Akai's MPC Software 'controllers' including the new MPC Studio 2, the MPC Touch, MPC Renaissance & original MPC Studio and MPC StudioB lack.
By spair Mon Dec 29, 2014 9:43 am
I just purchased the Renaissance the day after XMAS. I have been an MPC user since the 2000xl was released.A year ago I bought a Maschine Mikro wanting to get back into the old school simplistic way of programing sounds. Being that for the past 5 years I was recording ITB with Ableton and a midi controller. There were some cool features with the Maschine but I would always run into roadblocks which would stump my creative flow. I.E. copying bars and sequences. Simple commands that had me clicking the mouse too many times.

I've only had my REN for 3 days and I can honestly say it is 10X easier to use than the Maschine. At least for me! Akai really nailed it when it came to the hardware design and functionality. I love how they kept a similar screen layout of the 2000 and the fact that I barley have to use my mouse or keyboard is huge plus!

Have a happy new year everyone!
User avatar
By THE ADVERSARY Tue Dec 30, 2014 4:35 am
kaydigi wrote:The Mikro maschines have a lot of menu diving, the mk2 and maschine studio can be used just as effective as the mpc ren without a mouse.


If you disallow the awkwardness of certain Maschine functions it can but even after all this time Maschine still has a somewhat strange way of doing things.

We have just accepted that it's the NI way of doing things.
User avatar
By Triple-X Tue Dec 30, 2014 5:41 pm
AGREED.

There are definitely pros and cons to both ways of working.. many of which depend on just that... YOUR way of working.

But I do agree that the MPC just feels easier and more intuitive. I also started on a 2000 Classic, so there's that. lol.
By spair Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:22 am
kaydigi wrote:The Mikro maschines have a lot of menu diving, the mk2 and maschine studio can be used just as effective as the mpc ren without a mouse.


There's some truth to that but esthetically I think the Ren is much better. Flip screen makes all the difference. Pads to. To each is own.
By huh? Wed Dec 31, 2014 4:13 am
Yeeeaaah, I’m still trying to decide if I should give the Studio a go, expect I’m coming from the MPC3000 (first and only MPC model I have ever used)
User avatar
By RayDeeyay Wed Dec 31, 2014 1:59 pm
Another, unexpected plus for the Ren is that, on my setup at least, it has a noticeably punchier sound. I am not sure if this is due to the inbuilt soundcard interface or the MPC software. Has anyone else noticed this?
User avatar
By pk1 Wed Dec 31, 2014 4:12 pm
id have to say your hearing things my man.

mpc audio interface is not very high quality. of course it does not have crazy AD/DA's
but its not needed either.

you might here a difference if you loaded same snare and kik in a 3000 a 60 maybe even a o.g. 2k and compared it to the same kik/snr from maschine or ren. but from ren to maschine not going to be a difference.

id say you have your monitors eq'd to "punch"
By spair Sun Jan 04, 2015 10:32 pm
huh? wrote:Yeeeaaah, I’m still trying to decide if I should give the Studio a go, expect I’m coming from the MPC3000 (first and only MPC model I have ever used)


If you use a 3000 you will love the REN. The record,play,and stop buttons are identical.