By tbeltrans
Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:39 pm
When I watched that video that kaydigi posted, I came away with a different interpretation than I am reading here. Since this X is my first MPC product, maybe I have not yet developed the cynicism from past experience with the product line. 
Anyway, I heard the Akai guy saying that Akai intends to continue to support the MPC X/Live with many software releases, each making the system more stable while adding a few features.
Personally, I would prefer a focus on making what they have already released, as stable as possible, rather than dumping in a bunch of new features on top of something that is not yet as stable as it could be.
I have long thought that if there were ever a class action suit against Microsoft (back around the time of XP), it should demand that Microsoft stop adding features and fix what they already have, and not release any new features until that was achieved. So my comments are not aimed directly at Akai, but at any products that depend on solid software or firmware instead.
What I heard from that guy in the video made more sense to me as a conservative long term approach to developing these products, than trying to achieve a big splash by dumping in a bunch of features that don't really work as they should. However, if Akai does not support this product for the long term, then it really doesn't matter anyway, because nothing would happen with these products, good or bad. I sure hope that won't be the case.
Tony
Anyway, I heard the Akai guy saying that Akai intends to continue to support the MPC X/Live with many software releases, each making the system more stable while adding a few features.
Personally, I would prefer a focus on making what they have already released, as stable as possible, rather than dumping in a bunch of new features on top of something that is not yet as stable as it could be.
I have long thought that if there were ever a class action suit against Microsoft (back around the time of XP), it should demand that Microsoft stop adding features and fix what they already have, and not release any new features until that was achieved. So my comments are not aimed directly at Akai, but at any products that depend on solid software or firmware instead.
What I heard from that guy in the video made more sense to me as a conservative long term approach to developing these products, than trying to achieve a big splash by dumping in a bunch of features that don't really work as they should. However, if Akai does not support this product for the long term, then it really doesn't matter anyway, because nothing would happen with these products, good or bad. I sure hope that won't be the case.
Tony





