Peace Marc happy new year.
Hey man are you trying to make us old? Lmao lol
Just kidding.
So you you got that Fantom? That's a dope joint. I was going to get but now lm getting 37 key Korg joint. Less money plus l want 37 keys do l can rock with the MPC Live.
I like The one it looks cool. Tight sequencer and internal functions. Wanna see if it sells.
marctronixx wrote:first off respect to the old school commenters still rockin' on this forum (Danoc, Charles, lampdog -- i see yall) and a bow to the boss MPC TUTOR...
now my comments...
i was one of the first to get both the live and X. i sold them both a few months ago to cats who would give them the love they deserve. i moved on to the Fantom 8 platform because i wanted a different workflow.
this weekend i saw andy at the inmusic both and saw the one (i didn't even know it existed). it has a nice feel to it. the pads are smaller and feel that way but still have that mpc feel.
i was going to grab a 707 just because i miss creating music on the go in standalone (i would carry it everyday) but at the price point of the one its a no brainer over roland, and i am a huge roland fan (already ordered the jupiter x).
im not gonna miss the battery nor ableton because i don't use computers for music. bluetooth and wireless were gimmicks TO ME (YMMV) and preferred midi for near zero latency. the phono input--maaaaaybe ... it was a "nice to have".
i track out to an analog desk and will miss the extra outputs, but im also used to hardware gear with only two outputs so ill get over that.
anyone on the fence about this unit should give it a consideration. its still got the live/x swag, just in a smaller box (i also much prefer the square over the rectangle of the live). the physical buttons are a GOOD REASON to consider the ONE!!! less menu diving and shift+ pad (which I never got into because I would not remember the shortcuts. :p) nonsense.
=====
MPC tutor mentioned a few pages back (i read this entire thread) he was not comfy with inmusic hiding the ableton stuff "just because" , and I agree with him, but sadly I see more hardware companies (like tektronix for example) making gear that "ships" with all the bells and whistles (software) but its "hidden" and you can only access it if you buy that additional functionality. the company will then push a software update over ethernet to "unlock" the features. its a business model that seems to be trickling down to music companies, so i can totally see the big corporation in-music adopting this on future products...