dunkeyman: Try it yourself, take a hip-hop tune and cut away one beat from each bar, for example the second one, so your 1234 becomes 134. Kick-Snare-Kick-Snare becomes Kick-Kick-Snare. Great beat IMO!
With stem separation this can be done quite cleany. Because stems are on separate tracks, the cut points don't have to be the same on every track, so you can re-flow the vocals over the new 3/4 beat.
By HouseWithoutMouse
Mon Jan 15, 2024 2:08 am

By Lampdog
Mon Jan 15, 2024 3:26 am
I did it in a past mpc battle beat, in the middle of the beat I changed it up to 3/4 for a completely diff feel and then went back to normal. It’s the one that starts with the spray paint can shaking.

By hyena
Mon Jan 15, 2024 9:53 am
well, 3/4 isn't the only alternative to 4/4... i remember a Saul Williams track that was in 5/4 or some other odd time sig, it was fkin ace. oh, underground by eminem too is 5/4... pretty sure some dalek stuff is odd time sig too....
Ableton Live 12 Certified Trainer
https://rexistenz.bandcamp.com/
http://hyena666.bandcamp.com
https://blackrag.noblogs.org/
https://blackragproductions.bandcamp.com/
By dunkeyman
Tue Jan 16, 2024 4:41 pm
HouseWithoutMouse wrote:dunkeyman: Try it yourself, take a hip-hop tune and cut away one beat from each bar, for example the second one, so your 1234 becomes 134. Kick-Snare-Kick-Snare becomes Kick-Kick-Snare. Great beat IMO!
With stem separation this can be done quite cleany. Because stems are on separate tracks, the cut points don't have to be the same on every track, so you can re-flow the vocals over the new 3/4 beat.
It can work, I just meant it makes it sort of impossible to dance or head bob to in the traditional sense. Like the Eminem song with the odd time signature, he chose it because he wanted a military-sounding vibe to it. Kind of like certain time signatures are for waltzing.

By hyena
Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:53 am
MrFrigo wrote:Would it be possible to have some tracks on 4/4 and one on 3/4 within the same sequence ?
Thank you
sorry i just now realize i misunderstood your question and answered yes. well, the answer is no but yes, sort of... you have to use the track "length" parameter (that let's you specify a number of beats that will be looped\repeated in your track, independent from the other tracks of your sequence).
of course it's not what you asked but might be a feasible workaround in some situations...
Ableton Live 12 Certified Trainer
https://rexistenz.bandcamp.com/
http://hyena666.bandcamp.com
https://blackrag.noblogs.org/
https://blackragproductions.bandcamp.com/
By Jeff Soltero
Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:29 pm
for me personally, ive found my studio experiences to be less frustrating when i just use the machines the way they were intended to be used. if it doesnt do what you want, a workaround is probably just going to cause more frustration down the line in your project. would be better to just connect your mpc to the daw and use the daw to do these things imho. save yourself the headache.
By Coyote Loops!
Tue Dec 16, 2025 10:17 pm
I just have to add my $.02 here. I'm running 3.6 firmware on an MPC One + and I just can't believe that I can't change time signatures from one sequence to the next. I can change tempo and feel, BUT NOT THE TIME SIGNATURE? The workaround of inserting bars doesn't have a time signature option on v.3.6. I've had $150 drum machines that could do this. Am I really expected to revert to an earlier firmware version to be able to do this? The MPC has been around since 1988; the inability to change time signatures like this is insulting. Now that I'm thinking about it, I bet it can't change bpm from one bar to the next, either.

By MPC-Tutor
Tue Dec 16, 2025 10:33 pm
you can change time signature per bar very easily, just set a project time signature of 1/4 or 1/8 and make 1 bar = 1 beat. So for 1 bar of 7/8 meter, create a 7 bar sequence in 1/8. I cover this in MPC Bible 3, where I create a beat featuring one bar of 4/4 followed by 1 bar of 7/8.
Coyote Loops! wrote:I just have to add my $.02 here. I'm running 3.6 firmware on an MPC One + and I just can't believe that I can't change time signatures from one sequence to the next. I can change tempo and feel, BUT NOT THE TIME SIGNATURE? The workaround of inserting bars doesn't have a time signature option on v.3.6. I've had $150 drum machines that could do this. Am I really expected to revert to an earlier firmware version to be able to do this? The MPC has been around since 1988; the inability to change time signatures like this is insulting. Now that I'm thinking about it, I bet it can't change bpm from one bar to the next, either.
By Coyote Loops!
Wed Dec 17, 2025 2:18 am
[quote="MPC-Tutor"]you can change time signature per bar very easily, just set a project time signature of 1/4 or 1/8 and make 1 bar = 1 beat. So for 1 bar of 7/8 meter, create a 7 bar sequence in 1/8. I cover this in MPC Bible 3, where I create a beat featuring one bar of 4/4 followed by 1 bar of 7/8.
...and the count-in metronome lasts for how many clicks?
...and the count-in metronome lasts for how many clicks?
By Elektrobolt
Wed Dec 17, 2025 6:11 am
MrFrigo wrote:Would it be possible to have some tracks on 4/4 and one on 3/4 within the same sequence ?
Thank you
The sequencer always consists of some resolution of ticks. When some region with some time signature is chosen, the GUI displays this region using the T/S. Changing the T/S does not change the resolution, so yes, as some people continue to point out, it is possible to do what you ask. Is it feasible to do with a global T/S, no not really. Also, I don't think and don't care for different parallel T/S events, but serial over time T/S events, that I absolutely care for.
By Elektrobolt
Wed Dec 17, 2025 6:44 am
dunkeyman wrote:HouseWithoutMouse wrote:dunkeyman: Try it yourself, take a hip-hop tune and cut away one beat from each bar, for example the second one, so your 1234 becomes 134. Kick-Snare-Kick-Snare becomes Kick-Kick-Snare. Great beat IMO!
With stem separation this can be done quite cleany. Because stems are on separate tracks, the cut points don't have to be the same on every track, so you can re-flow the vocals over the new 3/4 beat.
It can work, I just meant it makes it sort of impossible to dance or head bob to in the traditional sense. Like the Eminem song with the odd time signature, he chose it because he wanted a military-sounding vibe to it. Kind of like certain time signatures are for waltzing.
It most certainly works. Whether people are creative enough, or record labels feel that it is "worth" taking a chance is a whole different story. Just because you haven't heard such music, does not mean it cannot be made suitable for what you suggested.
People "presume" waltzing when 3/4-time is mentioned, simply because that is what it's generally called and traditionally often used for that purpose. There are lots of odd time signatures that people do not presume anything at all about, simple because there is no such tradition with them. In the same way, there are well known songs, that happens to be in all kinds of odd time signatures, but that people would not think is the case. For example, if I were to say, "We are the champions, by Queen", 3/4-time is not what many would think. It may not sound like a 4/4, but it also does not sound like a waltz.
It's because the music industry has washed the market for so long, that 4/4 is the de facto standard. I am not claiming that it would have been different if it was not so, but it is a fact that it is. That also does not remove the need for creative tools. Without such tools, the music people will be listening more and more to re-generated 4/4 music.
There is a reason why, if you follow music back, there was more creativity with things like T/S, tempo, etc. than today. What I mean is, the amount of music being pumped out today compared to the past is way more, but variation is also proportionally way less.
This is why I like experiments with these properties in ANY music genre. I would like to have as much musical capability as possible in the tools I am using. You may think differently.

By MPC-Tutor
Wed Dec 17, 2025 7:55 am
Coyote Loops! wrote:...and the count-in metronome lasts for how many clicks?
You can have as much count in as you wish, simply enable 'Auto record at loop start' and you can start your sequence from any time location and recording won't begin until it loops back to 1:1:0.
The MPC is a powerful machine and clearly some of the newer features have made it challenging to incorporate more flexible time signature support, but for those times when it is required, we have workarounds. I can live with this considering everything else it now offers.
Now that I'm thinking about it, I bet it can't change bpm from one bar to the next, either.
You can, and you can even change BPM from one tick to the next if you so desire, using 'sequence tempo' events.
By Elektrobolt
Thu Jan 29, 2026 7:39 pm
I wonder if "freely used" time signatures will see light of day on the "legacy" MPC X now...
I wonder what happened to the flexible time signatures to be released in spring of last year.
I wonder what happened to the flexible time signatures to be released in spring of last year.
By Masi
Fri Jan 30, 2026 8:26 pm
Elektrobolt wrote:I wonder what happened to the flexible time signatures to be released in spring of last year.
The weather was bad last year so the time signatures seeds didn't sprout.



