LOFI-12 XT VS. SP404 MK2Ok, I've come down to a mini bout between these two titans. I had the MK2 since Nov.2021 and the XT since May 2024. Saying that, the little time I had with the XT proved to be the better experience and better workflow than the MK2.
First off, after a while on the 404, XT's little screen made me laugh in a good way. It did felt SPish but in yellow OLED and an inch smaller, like an SP Gameboy. For my myopia eyes, I do prefer the larger SP screen. The small letters on the XT seem to blur away. Solution was to put the XT at a certain height from the table to my eyes with a 30° degree tilt. Now its clear. That or get my glasses which I already lost. Not to say that you can't read the screen, because you can and features are easy to identify to not get lost, but it is a tiny screen.
I really do like sampling on the XT. You can sample to the pads and/or to the SD card that you can feed it an afternoon of material, disconnect it and create stuff all night with batteries and its internal speaker. Though not as streamlined as MPC-Live2 speaker but its way better quality sound than the Volca and PO33ko speaker.
I will say it "CHOPPING IS SUPERIOR ON THE XT!!!" Yup, SP is garbage in comparison with its limited control knobs. All XT control knobs turn full 360° giving it the advantage here. SP knob turning is so tedious with its hard left or hard right that mistakes and unwanted parts are inevitable because once you reached the limit of that knob, you have to leave the chop screen and adjust the knob back, I always hated that. XT knobs are so well thought out that you can zoom and chop with ease as if it were a touchscreen of an MPC. Chopping is nondestructive so you can add or subtract to a chop and will not interfere with the other chops. I do suggest to install fatter knobs on the XT, your fingers will thank you. No number chopping which I'd prefer and it is by waveform but totally relies on your ears! Times I thought I could brush the cursor up to the waveform and get the chop exact, really sounded off, so I had to listen for that sweet spot and chop by ear.
Sequencing is kinda wonky at the moment after the 1.1.5 update. Its off at the first bar but comes back in time after the first pass. So the SP wins in this department. However, once it is working, the XT's sequencing can rival the Digitakt mk1 with its parameter locks and slice features. Up to 64 steps or in real time. Each pattern is a building block to a song.
Navigation? XT hands down wins. No menu diving at all, everything is on the panel for real-time access to features whether the sequencer is playing or not. And thats another plus of the XT; being able to edit samples and patterns in realtime without pausing the music. You can mutate sounds on the fly making it a creative live tool not just studio.
Final verdict: I get a better, smoother workflow with the XT than on the SP. Those looking for a cheaper alternative to the Digitakt mk1, look no further, Sonicware got you. Its lofi processor is tasteful and crunchy. Not an SP1200 clone in its tone but you will get plenty of mileage. Incredible groovebox and the direction Roland should've took before releasing the MK2, because now the SP feels like new features in an obsolete box.
LoFi-12 XT wins.
