By droctii
Mon Oct 21, 2024 7:09 am
This post might ruffle some feathers, but it's crazy to me to hear people complain about the MPC's stem processing time.
I recall the ridiculously long saving, loading, and chopping times of my Yamaha RS7000, which my main beat making machine almost 25 years ago. You could make and eat dinner by the time it finished auto-chopping, but it was well worth the wait. I picked up my first MPC (2000 XL) over 20 years ago, and chopping and manipulating samples was time-consuming too. Yet, you patiently waited and did because that's part of the process.
Myths and folklore vs common reality
There's this too-ofren repeated myth that you'll lose you inspiration if you have to wait 3-5 minutes on processing. How crazy is that?! If you lose your inspiration by letting the processing give you a better output, then the issue is likely you.
Maybe a significant reason there aren't as many timeless/classic records these days is because too many people are impatient. Most great records take a while to create.
A proposed solution
Akai should let us choose between 1) higher quality stems, which may take up to 2-3 times as long, and 2) the regular stems. This would similar to the Audio Warp Algorithm choices (Pro Ten or Basic) we already have.
The higher quality option should be available in Preferences and as a check box in Stems pop-up before running the stems.
I'm not sure where each of you stand on this issue. Yes, it's 2024 ,and most laptops/computers can deliver faster and better stemming results.
But as of now, the MPC is still light-years ahead of other standalone hardware in its class, and 2-3 minutes of processing for better stem won't kill you or your creativity. Plus, if you ever used online stemming or RipX, you know that it can take several minutes for higher quality stems.
But hey, that's just my three cents. What say you?
I recall the ridiculously long saving, loading, and chopping times of my Yamaha RS7000, which my main beat making machine almost 25 years ago. You could make and eat dinner by the time it finished auto-chopping, but it was well worth the wait. I picked up my first MPC (2000 XL) over 20 years ago, and chopping and manipulating samples was time-consuming too. Yet, you patiently waited and did because that's part of the process.
Myths and folklore vs common reality
There's this too-ofren repeated myth that you'll lose you inspiration if you have to wait 3-5 minutes on processing. How crazy is that?! If you lose your inspiration by letting the processing give you a better output, then the issue is likely you.
Maybe a significant reason there aren't as many timeless/classic records these days is because too many people are impatient. Most great records take a while to create.
A proposed solution
Akai should let us choose between 1) higher quality stems, which may take up to 2-3 times as long, and 2) the regular stems. This would similar to the Audio Warp Algorithm choices (Pro Ten or Basic) we already have.
The higher quality option should be available in Preferences and as a check box in Stems pop-up before running the stems.
I'm not sure where each of you stand on this issue. Yes, it's 2024 ,and most laptops/computers can deliver faster and better stemming results.
But as of now, the MPC is still light-years ahead of other standalone hardware in its class, and 2-3 minutes of processing for better stem won't kill you or your creativity. Plus, if you ever used online stemming or RipX, you know that it can take several minutes for higher quality stems.
But hey, that's just my three cents. What say you?




